Playing church: understanding ritual and religious experience resourced by Gadamer's concept of play
This article uses Gadamer's concept of play as a common lens through which both traditional church liturgy and imaginative evangelical practices of engaging with God can be understood. The category of play encompasses processes which exhibit a back-and-forth motion and functions in Gadamer'...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2018]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 79, Issue: 3, Pages: 323-336 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Evangelical movement
/ Liturgy
/ Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1900-2002
/ Game
|
RelBib Classification: | KDG Free church NBE Anthropology RC Liturgy VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Play
B Ritual B Liturgy B Aesthetics B Hans-Georg Gadamer B Evangelicalism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | This article uses Gadamer's concept of play as a common lens through which both traditional church liturgy and imaginative evangelical practices of engaging with God can be understood. The category of play encompasses processes which exhibit a back-and-forth motion and functions in Gadamer's aesthetics to describe the relationship between artwork and viewer. Through an aesthetics of play, Gadamer accounts for the presence of truth in art. As I demonstrate in this paper, liturgy displays the playful characteristics of artwork, allowing for a theologically realist interpretation of divine presence. The final part of this paper considers the imaginative evangelical practices described by anthropologist T. M. Luhrmann, which I refer to as God-play. I argue that there is an unexpected commonality between God-play and traditional liturgy in the form of a functional similarity between the two and propose that God-play may be regarded as liturgy-like practice that has not been traditionalised. My evaluation is that this is a positive development, which opens the opportunity for divine encounter to those alienated from traditional liturgies. However, caution must be taken to avoid inappropriately trivial imaginings of God, and I conclude by offering suggestions for the church and academy in cautiously welcoming these practices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-2335 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2017.1406817 |