What Does a Prophet Know?

This essay on Cathleen Kaveny's Prophecy Without Contempt (2016) challenges her argument from two opposing sides. First, it critiques all jeremiads. It asks how a person uttering prophetic indictments, whether in the form of a classical jeremiad or the more moderate form that Kaveny argues for,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of religious ethics
Main Author: Kavka, Martin (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2018]
In: Journal of religious ethics
Review of:Prophecy without contempt (Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2016) (Kavka, Martin)
Further subjects:B jeremiad
B Book review
B Mike Huckabee
B Abraham Joshua Heschel
B Cathleen Kaveny
B Prophecy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This essay on Cathleen Kaveny's Prophecy Without Contempt (2016) challenges her argument from two opposing sides. First, it critiques all jeremiads. It asks how a person uttering prophetic indictments, whether in the form of a classical jeremiad or the more moderate form that Kaveny argues for, can possibly know of what she speaks, given the otherness of God. Second, it calls for more jeremiads. It asks whether a person, whether religious or not, might indeed know enough to offer withering jeremiads, in those cases where she sees the target of her jeremiad making flagrantly incompatible commitments.
ISSN:1467-9795
Reference:Kritik in "Response to Critics (2018)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12213