A Polyvocal Body
This essay aims to elucidate how multiple voices and traditions should interact with one another in the practice of ethics. First, it explores some of the major ways in which questions of bodily autonomy function in secular feminist and Jewish bioethical discourses. It then uses case studies to illu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 244-267 |
| Further subjects: | B
Feminism
B Heteronomy B Judaism B Autonomy B Body |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580188028 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180820133637.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180820s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12096 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580188028 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510188028 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510188028 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1165006286 |0 (DE-627)1029216673 |0 (DE-576)51019981X |4 aut |a Epstein-Levi, Rebecca | |
| 109 | |a Epstein-Levi, Rebecca |a Epstein-Levi, Rebecca J. |a Levi, Rebecca J. E. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Polyvocal Body |c Rebecca J. E. Levi |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay aims to elucidate how multiple voices and traditions should interact with one another in the practice of ethics. First, it explores some of the major ways in which questions of bodily autonomy function in secular feminist and Jewish bioethical discourses. It then uses case studies to illuminate ways each discourse's concepts of bodily autonomy can be deeply problematic, and argues that the strengths in each discourse can serve as important correctives for the weaknesses in the other. It suggests that some formal features of rabbinic texts can serve as a model for a discourse of constant and animated mutual correction. Finally, it examines two case studies in light of this model. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Judaism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Body | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Heteronomy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 43(2015), 2, Seite 244-267 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:244-267 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jore.12096 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12096 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12096 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 302260596X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580188028 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180820111424 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||