Biblical Hebrew Bal and Privative Negation

The Biblical Hebrew lexeme bal has been described as a poetic and prophetic synonym with lō’ in previous research. However, cognate morphemes in the Semitic languages outside Northwest Semitic, as well as other Biblical Hebrew lexemes derived from the relevant root morpheme, e.g. bǝlî and lǝḇiltî, m...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sjörs, Ambjörn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2018]
In: Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 297-322
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1580304095
003 DE-627
005 20180822164750.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180822s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jss/fgy001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1580304095 
035 |a (DE-576)510304095 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ510304095 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1043724206  |0 (DE-627)770857515  |0 (DE-576)395149517  |4 aut  |a Sjörs, Ambjörn 
109 |a Sjörs, Ambjörn 
245 1 0 |a Biblical Hebrew Bal and Privative Negation  |c Ambjörn Sjörs 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Biblical Hebrew lexeme bal has been described as a poetic and prophetic synonym with lō’ in previous research. However, cognate morphemes in the Semitic languages outside Northwest Semitic, as well as other Biblical Hebrew lexemes derived from the relevant root morpheme, e.g. bǝlî and lǝḇiltî, may be identified with privative grammatical morphemes, i.e. grammatical morphemes that cancel an association. It is argued that, most of the time, bal too should be identified with privative negation, and that it is a poetic and prophetic synonym with lǝḇiltî (with different co-occurrence restrictions). Other times, the uses of bal can be explained as typical for the grammaticalization of privative expressions. The use of bal as a negator, for example, can be explained in terms of the grammaticalization of a conventional implicature, by which a salient feature, privation, became bleached semantically in favour of its implicature, negation. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Semitic studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1956  |g 63(2018), 2, Seite 297-322  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339423  |w (DE-600)2066649-4  |w (DE-576)100202497  |x 1477-8556  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:63  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:297-322 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jss/article/63/2/297/5076109  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgy001  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 302297177X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1580304095 
LOK |0 005 20180822162150 
LOK |0 008 180822||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL