Biblical Hebrew Bal and Privative Negation
The Biblical Hebrew lexeme bal has been described as a poetic and prophetic synonym with lō’ in previous research. However, cognate morphemes in the Semitic languages outside Northwest Semitic, as well as other Biblical Hebrew lexemes derived from the relevant root morpheme, e.g. bǝlî and lǝḇiltî, m...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 297-322 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1580304095 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180822164750.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180822s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jss/fgy001 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1580304095 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)510304095 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510304095 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1043724206 |0 (DE-627)770857515 |0 (DE-576)395149517 |4 aut |a Sjörs, Ambjörn | |
109 | |a Sjörs, Ambjörn | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Biblical Hebrew Bal and Privative Negation |c Ambjörn Sjörs |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The Biblical Hebrew lexeme bal has been described as a poetic and prophetic synonym with lō’ in previous research. However, cognate morphemes in the Semitic languages outside Northwest Semitic, as well as other Biblical Hebrew lexemes derived from the relevant root morpheme, e.g. bǝlî and lǝḇiltî, may be identified with privative grammatical morphemes, i.e. grammatical morphemes that cancel an association. It is argued that, most of the time, bal too should be identified with privative negation, and that it is a poetic and prophetic synonym with lǝḇiltî (with different co-occurrence restrictions). Other times, the uses of bal can be explained as typical for the grammaticalization of privative expressions. The use of bal as a negator, for example, can be explained in terms of the grammaticalization of a conventional implicature, by which a salient feature, privation, became bleached semantically in favour of its implicature, negation. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Semitic studies |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1956 |g 63(2018), 2, Seite 297-322 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341339423 |w (DE-600)2066649-4 |w (DE-576)100202497 |x 1477-8556 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:63 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:297-322 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jss/article/63/2/297/5076109 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgy001 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 302297177X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1580304095 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180822162150 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180822||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |