Response to Michael Rea
For several years now, Michael Rea has been working to foster a fruitful discussion between theologians and analytic philosophers, and his article review nicely exemplifies those efforts. Rea recognises that he and I agree on several key points, the most important of which is that cataphatic theolo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 80-82 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theology
/ Language
/ Conception
|
RelBib Classification: | FA Theology VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
apophatic theology
B Concept B Language B Predetermination B Norm B cataphatic theology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |