What is the Scandal of Philosophy?
The central question of this paper is: what has Kant’s Refutation of Idealism argument proven, if anything? What is the real scandal of philosophy and universal human reason? I argue that Kant’s Refutation argument can only be considered as sound if we assume that his target is what I call ‘metaphys...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2018
|
In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2018, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 141-166 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
/ Metaphysics
/ Criticism
|
Further subjects: | B
metaphysical external-world skepticism
epistemological external-world skepticism
transcendental idealism
material idealism
transcendental arguments
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1581471505 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190930231510.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181002s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-20171276 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1581471505 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)511471505 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511471505 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a de Sá Pereira, Roberto Horácio |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a What is the Scandal of Philosophy? |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The central question of this paper is: what has Kant’s Refutation of Idealism argument proven, if anything? What is the real scandal of philosophy and universal human reason? I argue that Kant’s Refutation argument can only be considered as sound if we assume that his target is what I call ‘metaphysical external-world skepticism’ (rather than traditional ‘epistemological external-world skepticism’). What is in question is not the ‘existence’ of outside things, but their very ‘nature’, that is, the claim that the thing outside us, which appears to us as persistent body in space, exists in itself as a substantia noumenon. Assuming the indirect-realist view that we only immediately know ideas and that their putative objects are known by inference, the metaphysical external-world skeptic doubts that the nature of things outside oneself is mind-independent. | ||
601 | |a Scandal | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
650 | 4 | |a metaphysical external-world skepticism |x epistemological external-world skepticism |x transcendental idealism |x material idealism |x transcendental arguments | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118559796 |0 (DE-627)133368785 |0 (DE-576)208982949 |2 gnd |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4038936-4 |0 (DE-627)106230220 |0 (DE-576)209032545 |2 gnd |a Metaphysik |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |0 (DE-627)104137800 |0 (DE-576)209000694 |2 gnd |a Kritik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 8(2018), 3, Seite 141-166 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:141-166 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-20171276 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3027514091 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1581471505 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20181002033407 | ||
LOK | |0 008 181002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Criticism,Criticism,Metaphysics,Prima philosophia |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Critique,Critique,Métaphysique |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Crítica,Crítica,Metafísica |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Critica,Critica,Metafisica |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 形而上学,批评,批判,评论 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 形而上學,批評,批判,評論 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Crítica,Crítica,Metafísica |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Критика (мотив),Критика,Метафизика |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Κριτική (μοτίβο),Κριτική,Μεταφυσική |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Kant, Imānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuelʹ,1724-1804,Kant, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuell,1724-1804,Kant, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kantius,1724-1804,Kanto, Imanueru,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūʾīl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿAmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Ḳanṭ, ʿImanuʾel,1724-1804,Kānṭ, ʿAmmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Cant,1724-1804,Kanti, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kants, Imanuels,1724-1804,Kants, Immanuēls,1724-1804,Kantas, I.,1724-1804,Kantas, Imanuelis,1724-1804,Pseudo-Kant,1724-1804,Yi man nu er Kang de,1724-1804,Yimannuer-Kangde,1724-1804,Kangde, Yimannuer,1724-1804,Kang de,1724-1804,Kangde,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Imm.,1724-1804,Kant, Inmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Manuel,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Qanṭ, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kanto,1724-1804,K'ang-tê, I.,1724-1804,K'ang-tê,1724-1804,Kānt,1724-1804,Kānṭ, Imainual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuwil,1724-1804,Kant, Immanual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuell,1724-1804,Kanto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kant, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuele,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuele,1724-1804,Kant, E.,1724-1804,Kant, Manuele,1724-1804,Kant, M.,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Amanuil,1724-1804,K`ant`u,1724-1804,Canto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Im.,1724-1804,Kant, `Imanu'el,1724-1804,Kānt, `Ammānūʹīl,1724-1804,Kant, IImmanuil,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kant, Imainual,1724-1804,K`ang-te,1724-1804,Kan teu,1724-1804 , Prima Philosophia |