Can American Courts Respect Religious Reasoning?

In 1977, legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin published Taking Rights Seriously, and it quickly received wide notice. At the time recently appointed H.L.A. Hart's successor at Oxford, Dworkin combined jurisprudential analysis with pointed commentary on United States Supreme Court cases, the latter...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stoner, James Reist (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 2017, Volume: 110, Issue: 3, Pages: 464-469
Review of:Taking rites seriously (New York, NY : Cambrdige University Press, 2015) (Stoner, James Reist)
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B USA / Court / Religion / Argumantation
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KBQ North America
XA Law
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1582148090
003 DE-627
005 20190313160830.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181022s2017 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816017000189  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1582148090 
035 |a (DE-576)512148090 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ512148090 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1055774920  |0 (DE-627)793819237  |0 (DE-576)411214586  |4 aut  |a Stoner, James Reist 
109 |a Stoner, James Reist  |a Reist Stoner, James  |a Stoner, James R. Jr.  |a Reist-Stoner, James 
245 1 0 |a Can American Courts Respect Religious Reasoning?  |c James R. Stoner 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 1977, legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin published Taking Rights Seriously, and it quickly received wide notice. At the time recently appointed H.L.A. Hart's successor at Oxford, Dworkin combined jurisprudential analysis with pointed commentary on United States Supreme Court cases, the latter developed principally in essays in the New York Review of Books. Defining law through its aspiration to justice and defining justice in terms of rights, Dworkin argued that judges were entitled to use moral philosophy both to interpret legal rules through the principles they instantiate and to fill in gaps in the law by leveraging general legal concepts into more precise conceptions. Often paired with his contemporary John Rawls's Theory of Justice, Dworkin's theory that judges should rework the law when possible to insure “equal concern and respect” was seen to elaborate the practical meaning of Rawls's first principle of justice (equal rights to basic liberties) as well as to boost the activism of judges, whom he encouraged to model “Hercules.” 
652 |a AB:KBQ:XA 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |d g  |0 (DE-588)4078704-7  |0 (DE-627)106076612  |0 (DE-576)209209682  |2 gnd  |a USA 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4121346-4  |0 (DE-627)105770124  |0 (DE-576)209542543  |2 gnd  |a Gericht 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4002899-9  |0 (DE-627)106391631  |0 (DE-576)208849173  |2 gnd  |a Argumentation 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 110(2017), 3, Seite 464-469  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:110  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:464-469 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Beckwith, Francis, 1960 -   |t Taking rites seriously  |d New York, NY : Cambrdige University Press, 2015  |h xiv, 225 Seiten  |w (DE-627)826560148  |w (DE-576)481411542  |z 9781107533059  |z 9781107112728 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/can-american-courts-respect-religious-reasoning/1358D4C4AEC8C5EBB6291CEEBC9709B0  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816017000189  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3029353397 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1582148090 
LOK |0 005 20190313160830 
LOK |0 008 181022||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixrz  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049227  |a KBQ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053798  |a XA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Court,Court,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature,USA,Middle West,USA,USA,USA,USA,USA,USA,America,Confederate States of America,Midwest 
STB 0 0 |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Religion,Religions,Religion,Tribunal,Tribunal 
STC 0 0 |a Argumentación,Religión,Religión,Religión,Tribunal,Tribunal,Corte,Corte,Juicio (Motivo),Juicio 
STD 0 0 |a Argomentazione,Religione,Religione,Religione,Tribunale,Tribunale 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,法院,法庭,论据 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,法院,法庭,論據 
STG 0 0 |a Argumentação,Religião,Religião,Tribunal,Tribunal,Foro,Corte,Foro,Corte,Juízo (Motivo),Juízo 
STH 0 0 |a Аргументация,Религия (мотив),Религия,Суд (мотив),Суд 
STI 0 0 |a Δικαστήριο (μοτίβο),Δικαστήριο,Επιχειρηματολογία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a United States,United States of America,Vereinigte Staaten,Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika , United States of America,Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika,Amerika <USA>,United States of America,Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika,Amerika <USA>,USA,USA,Nord,Nördliche Vereinigte Staaten,Mittlerer Westen,USA,Middle West,Mittelwesten,Midwest,USA,Nordost,Nordöstliche Vereinigte Staaten,USA,Südost,Südöstliche Vereinigte Staaten,USA,West,Westliche Vereinigte Staaten,USA,Ost,Östliche Vereinigte Staaten,Nordwestamerika,USA,Nordwest,Pazifischer Nordwesten,Nordamerikanische Südstaaten,Konföderierte Staaten von Amerika,Confederate States of America,Südliche Vereinigte Staaten,Südatlantische Staaten,Südöstliche Staaten,Südwestliche USA,USA,Südweststaaten,Südwestliche Vereinigte Staaten,USA,Südwest,United States of America,Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika,Nordamerika,Amerika,United States,United States of America,Etats Unis,Etats-Unis,Vereinigte Staaten,Estados Unidos de America,EEUU,Vereinigte Staaten von Nordamerika,Soedinennye Štaty Ameriki,SŠA,Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki Północnej,Hēnōmenai Politeiai tēs Boreiu Amerikēs,Hēnōmenes Politeies tēs Amerikēs,HēPA,Ēnōmenes Politeies tēs Amerikēs,ĒPA,Meiguo,Etats-Unis d'Amérique,US , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Argumentieren