To Be in a Subject and Accident
Boethius identifies beings that are in a subject with what the Scholastics called predicamental accident, and predication by accident with the predication of what is in a subject. The first of these questionable assimilations went on to become terminology commonly accepted by Scholastics of all eras...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Vivarium
Year: 2015, Volume: 53, Issue: 2/4, Pages: 170-193 |
| RelBib Classification: | TB Antiquity TF Early Middle Ages VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Aristotle
predication
to be in a subject
accident
paronymy
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1582477280 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211014090024.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181031s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15685349-12341296 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1582477280 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)512477280 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ512477280 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gambra, José Miguel |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a To Be in a Subject and Accident |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Boethius identifies beings that are in a subject with what the Scholastics called predicamental accident, and predication by accident with the predication of what is in a subject. The first of these questionable assimilations went on to become terminology commonly accepted by Scholastics of all eras. On the other hand, the second, which seems quite consistent with the thinking of Aristotle, was only admitted with many reservations, probably because of the bewildering claims of Aristotle in Cat. 5, 2a27-34 about the predication of what is in the subject. In what follows I will try to show how these phrases, properly understood, are consistent with the idea that what is in the subject is said by accident of the substance, although they implicate a difficulty poorly resolved by Boethius himself and those who followed him on this point, of whom I will only mention by way of example some Scholastics from the 16th century. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aristotle |x predication |x to be in a subject |x accident |x paronymy | |
| 652 | |a TB:TF:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Vivarium |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1963 |g 53(2015), 2/4, Seite 170-193 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)325567093 |w (DE-600)2036954-2 |w (DE-576)094145016 |x 1568-5349 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2015 |g number:2/4 |g pages:170-193 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341296 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3030161021 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1582477280 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220524115858 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 181031||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053631 |a TF | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053534 |a TB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||