Aquinas on Forms, Substances and Artifacts

Thomas Aquinas sees a sharp metaphysical distinction between artifacts and substances, but does not offer any explicit account of it. We argue that for Aquinas the contribution that an artisan makes to the generation of an artifact compromises the causal responsibility of the form of that artifact f...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Marmodoro, Anna 1975- (Auteur) ; Page, Ben (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2016
Dans: Vivarium
Année: 2016, Volume: 54, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-21
RelBib Classification:KAE Moyen Âge central
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Aquinas substance artifact form hylomorphism unity
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Thomas Aquinas sees a sharp metaphysical distinction between artifacts and substances, but does not offer any explicit account of it. We argue that for Aquinas the contribution that an artisan makes to the generation of an artifact compromises the causal responsibility of the form of that artifact for what the artifact is; hence it compromises the metaphysical unity of the artifact to that of an accidental unity. By contrast, the metaphysical unity of a substance is achieved by a process of generation whereby the substantial form is solely responsible for what each part and the whole of a substance are. This, we submit, is where the metaphysical difference between artifacts and substances lies for Aquinas. Here we offer on behalf of Aquinas a novel account of the causal process of generation of substances, in terms of descending forms, and we bring out its explanatory merits by contrasting it to other existing accounts in the literature.
ISSN:1568-5349
Contient:In: Vivarium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341310