Contradiction and the Instant of Change Revisited
Instantaneous changes may well be thought to give rise to contradiction. If one endorses an explosive logic, where contradictions entail everything, this is entirely unacceptable. However, if one deploys a paraconsistent logic, which keeps contradictions under control, one may give perfectly coheren...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2017
|
| Dans: |
Vivarium
Année: 2017, Volume: 55, Numéro: 1/3, Pages: 217-226 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
instant of change
contradiction
dialetheism
state of changing
Leibniz Continuity Condition
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Maison d'édition) |
| Résumé: | Instantaneous changes may well be thought to give rise to contradiction. If one endorses an explosive logic, where contradictions entail everything, this is entirely unacceptable. However, if one deploys a paraconsistent logic, which keeps contradictions under control, one may give perfectly coherent and precise models of such changes. In In Contradiction the author showed how and he explored the philosophical implications of the model. Here, the author revisits the issue in the light of a recent critique by Greg Littmann. |
|---|---|
| Description matérielle: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Contradictory Change (2017)"
|
| Contient: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341337 |
