Contradictory Change
Graham Priest has argued that changes occur at a moment of change in which objects are in a contradictory state, being in both the state changed from and the state changed to. In “Moments of Change,” the current author rejected this model on the grounds that every change would require an infinite nu...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
| Dans: |
Vivarium
Année: 2017, Volume: 55, Numéro: 1/3, Pages: 227-236 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
contradictory change
change
contradiction
dialetheism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | Graham Priest has argued that changes occur at a moment of change in which objects are in a contradictory state, being in both the state changed from and the state changed to. In “Moments of Change,” the current author rejected this model on the grounds that every change would require an infinite number of other changes, and that for similar regress problems, the model is not compatible with the Leibniz Continuity Condition that Priest appeals to in the model’s support. In “Contradiction and the Instant of Change Revisited,” Priest rightly points out in response that any regress can be stopped by allowing that some changes can occur without a moment of change and that there are some exceptions to the lcc in the case of change. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5349 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Contradiction and the Instant of Change Revisited (2017)"
|
| Contient: | In: Vivarium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341336 |