The Problem of Justified Harm: a Reply to Gardner
In this paper, we critically examine Molly Gardner's favored solution to what she calls the problem of justified harm. We argue that Gardner's view is false and that her arguments in support of it are unconvincing. Finally, we briefly suggest an alternative solution to the problem which...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Année: 2018, Volume: 21, Numéro: 3, Pages: 735-742 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Éthique VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Problem of justified harm
B Causal account of harming B Molly Gardner B Counterfactual comparative account of harming |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | In this paper, we critically examine Molly Gardner's favored solution to what she calls the problem of justified harm. We argue that Gardner's view is false and that her arguments in support of it are unconvincing. Finally, we briefly suggest an alternative solution to the problem which avoids the difficulties that beset Gardner's proposal. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-018-9912-8 |