Clearing Up Some Misunderstandings: A Reply to L. Philip Barnes
Much of Barnes's critique depends on a misunderstanding of my position and, where we do substantively disagree, Barnes's arguments fail to take into account important distinctions. As a result, his arguments are not persuasive. In my reply, I begin by clarifying my position and then procee...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 46, Issue: 4, Pages: 793-798 |
Further subjects: | B
Anger
B Forgiveness B Reconciliation B unconditional forgiveness B Hope |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Much of Barnes's critique depends on a misunderstanding of my position and, where we do substantively disagree, Barnes's arguments fail to take into account important distinctions. As a result, his arguments are not persuasive. In my reply, I begin by clarifying my position and then proceed to address specific points of disagreement, identifying those distinctions that Barnes needs to take into account in critiquing my view. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Reference: | Kritik von "A Critical Response to Heidi C. Giannini (2018)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12246 |