Transcendence of the Negative: Günther Anders' Apocalyptic Phenomenology
When the apocalyptic is marginalized, not only is theology under threat of malpractice, but phenomenology is also, for at the core of apocalyptic thinking is the attempt to restrain the totalities that are at work implicitly in our social imaginaries. Most totalities are subtle, appearing even in ef...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-16 |
Further subjects: | B
Phenomenology
B Theology B Apocalypse B Transcendence B Günther Anders |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | When the apocalyptic is marginalized, not only is theology under threat of malpractice, but phenomenology is also, for at the core of apocalyptic thinking is the attempt to restrain the totalities that are at work implicitly in our social imaginaries. Most totalities are subtle, appearing even in efforts of unification through global peace. One might extract such insight from Günther Anders, who depicts an immanent, apocalyptic reality beyond the pale of bourgeois optimism and the theological imaginaries that enervate it. We have fallen out of imaginative touch with our everyday activities, and this has resulted in an apocalyptic blindness (Apokalypse-Blindheit) and optimism rooted in abstraction. Such blindness has degraded our conscience into conscientiousness to the point that even the Hiroshima bomber can abstract from his actions and be exempted easily from responsibility. Although a kind of phenomenologist, Anders criticized colleagues who, in the name of presuppositionlessness and observation, could abstract their thoughts far from the reality in which they lived and acted. This paper provides a general introduction to Anders' work and interprets his Transcendence of the Negative in order to demonstrate the values of apocalyptic phenomenology today. Anders extends a Levinasian eschatology of anticipation (which is precisely of that which one cannot expect) and demonstrates how transcendence, which typically is understood only in its positive element, also holds the capacity for turning a blind eye to the negative sociality of action. This transcendence often fuels a false optimism for an order of global peace and oneness, which inherently brings about an apocalyptic age, for it ends at one and eliminates any outside. Apocalyptic phenomenology can be one way to disrupt this tendency of blind abstraction by attending to unveiling (apokalypsis) itself, attuning our conscience to the level of concern proportionate to the threats that stand before it, and becoming restrainers of what Anders calls annihilism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel8040059 |