Prudential Versus Probative Arguments for Religious Faith: Descartes and Pascal on Reason and Faith

In this article, I show that Pascal's prudential agenda, centered on the Wager, more successfully overcomes the restrictions of Pyrrhonic skepticism expressed by Montaigne than Descartes' probative philosophy, which was based on his “ontological argument” for God's existence. Descarte...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sansom, Dennis L. ca. 21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI [2017]
In: Religions
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 8, Pages: 1-15
Further subjects:B Prudential Reasoning
B knowledge of God
B Pascal
B Descartes
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1586232789
003 DE-627
005 20190116170721.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel8080136  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1586232789 
035 |a (DE-576)516232789 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ516232789 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1165190273  |0 (DE-627)1029350043  |0 (DE-576)420533257  |4 aut  |a Sansom, Dennis L.  |d ca. 21. Jh. 
109 |a Sansom, Dennis L. ca. 21. Jh.  |a Sansom, Dennis ca. 21. Jh. 
245 1 0 |a Prudential Versus Probative Arguments for Religious Faith  |b Descartes and Pascal on Reason and Faith  |c Dennis Sansom 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article, I show that Pascal's prudential agenda, centered on the Wager, more successfully overcomes the restrictions of Pyrrhonic skepticism expressed by Montaigne than Descartes' probative philosophy, which was based on his “ontological argument” for God's existence. Descartes' attempt to base natural science on the metaphysical certainty of a non-deceiving God fails because he cannot prove that a non-deceiving Perfect Being is a “clear and distinct” idea. Pascal's attempt to base the knowledge of God upon the “reasons of the heart” accepts the epistemological restrictions of skepticism but provides a reason to develop passionate faith, thereby overcoming skepticism. I also show that Descartes and Pascal had different assumptions about the workings of the mind; Descartes relied on a model of the mind as a “theater,” which hindered his agenda, and Pascal upon a “holistic” model, which enabled him to make a prudential argument which was cognitively convincing. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Descartes 
650 4 |a Pascal 
650 4 |a knowledge of God 
650 4 |a Prudential Reasoning 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 8(2017), 8, Seite 1-15  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2017  |g number:8  |g pages:1-15 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/8/136/pdf?version=1501495980  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/8/136  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8080136  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3045395279 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1586232789 
LOK |0 005 20190115130925 
LOK |0 008 190115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL