The Necessary Result of Piety: Slavery and Religious Establishments in South Carolina Presbyterianism, 1800-1840
Historians have argued that disestablishment liberated American religion and allowed for the proliferation of religious practice and religious freedom, especially individualistic Evangelicalism in the South. This proposition reduced nearly all of southern Protestantism to Revivalist Evangelicalism,...
Published in: | Religions |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
In: |
Religions
|
Further subjects: | B
Slavery
B Presbyterian B Church B Authority B Establishment B South Carolina |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1586240854 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190116174436.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel8090180 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1586240854 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)516240854 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ516240854 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smith, Miles |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Necessary Result of Piety |b Slavery and Religious Establishments in South Carolina Presbyterianism, 1800-1840 |c Miles Smith |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Historians have argued that disestablishment liberated American religion and allowed for the proliferation of religious practice and religious freedom, especially individualistic Evangelicalism in the South. This proposition reduced nearly all of southern Protestantism to Revivalist Evangelicalism, and failed to account for the powerful presence of coercive Protestant religiosity in older southern states such as South Carolina. While they shared certain Evangelical particulars with frontier populations, Protestants in South Carolina, especially Presbyterians, rejected individualized religion in favor of religiosity that favored and nurtured activist state protection of both antidemocratic political norms and chattel slavery. This essay argues that ostensibly disestablished Presbyterianism in South Carolina helped intellectually erect and socially perpetuate coercive religious and state power. | ||
601 | |a South Carolina | ||
601 | |a Carolina | ||
601 | |a Presbyterianer | ||
650 | 4 | |a Presbyterian | |
650 | 4 | |a South Carolina | |
650 | 4 | |a Authority | |
650 | 4 | |a Church | |
650 | 4 | |a Establishment | |
650 | 4 | |a Slavery | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 8(2017), 9, Seite 1-15 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2017 |g number:9 |g pages:1-15 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/9/180/pdf?version=1504531398 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/9/180 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8090180 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2017 |e 9 |h 1-15 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 304540796X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1586240854 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190115144330 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a South Carolina |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Südkarolina,State of South Carolina,SC |