Margaret Cavendish, Feminist Ethics, and the Problem of Evil

This paper argues that, although Margaret Cavendish's main philosophical contributions are not in philosophy of religion, she makes a case for a defense of God, in spite of the worst sorts of harms being present in the world. Her arguments about those harms actually presage those of contemporar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Graper Hernandez, Jill (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI [2018]
In: Religions
Year: 2018, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-13
Further subjects:B atrocity paradigm
B Free Will
B Theodicy
B Margaret Cavendish
B Divine Justice
B problem of evil
B Feminist ethics
B redemptive goods
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 158635938X
003 DE-627
005 20190117162927.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190117s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel9040132  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)158635938X 
035 |a (DE-576)51635938X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ51635938X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1024115828  |0 (DE-627)719154995  |0 (DE-576)35815846X  |4 aut  |a Graper Hernandez, Jill 
109 |a Graper Hernandez, Jill  |a Graper-Hernandez, Jill  |a Hernandez, Jill Graper  |a Hernandez, Jill 
245 1 0 |a Margaret Cavendish, Feminist Ethics, and the Problem of Evil  |c Jill Graper Hernandez 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper argues that, although Margaret Cavendish's main philosophical contributions are not in philosophy of religion, she makes a case for a defense of God, in spite of the worst sorts of harms being present in the world. Her arguments about those harms actually presage those of contemporary feminist ethicists, which positions Cavendish's scholarship in a unique position: it makes a positive theodical contribution, by relying on evils that contemporary atheists think are the best evidence against the existence of God. To demonstrate that Cavendish's work should be considered as early modern feminist theodicy, this paper will briefly introduce the contemporary feminist worry about theodicy as a project, show that Cavendish shares the contemporary feminist view about situated evil, and argue that her theodicy aims for agreement about how to eradicate great moral evils while preserving free will—and so, carves out a space for future female philosophers of religion who aim to be agents of healing in the face of such evil. 
601 |a Feminist 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Margaret Cavendish 
650 4 |a atrocity paradigm 
650 4 |a Divine Justice 
650 4 |a Feminist ethics 
650 4 |a Free Will 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a redemptive goods 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 9(2018), 4, Seite 1-13  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:1-13 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/4/132/pdf?version=1525348642  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/4/132  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040132  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3046013612 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 158635938X 
LOK |0 005 20190117162217 
LOK |0 008 190117||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL