Hegel, The Reconceptualization of Science, and the Managerial Elite

It is true that Hegelian historicism has indeed led to a dominant ethos of moral relativism bound up with the belief that individual self-actualization is the highest value, thus creating a society that is, in the phrase of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. "after God." Nevertheless, this egocen...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Christian bioethics
Main Author: Carlton, Clark 1964- (Author)
Contributors: Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2017]
In: Christian bioethics
Review of:After God (Yonkers, New York : St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2017) (Carlton, Clark)
RelBib Classification:TJ Modern history
VA Philosophy
ZB Sociology
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:It is true that Hegelian historicism has indeed led to a dominant ethos of moral relativism bound up with the belief that individual self-actualization is the highest value, thus creating a society that is, in the phrase of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. "after God." Nevertheless, this egocentric and nihilistic relativism exists alongside a robust and militant moral totalitarianism enforced by the modern clerisy of the media, multi-national corporations, and government bureaucrats, that is, a "managerial elite." This article argues that the transcendental idealism of Kant and the subsequent historicization of Kant's dialectic by Hegel has served to reconceptualize the older, Baconian view of science, creating the idea that scientific progress is moving toward the goal of a future perfection of absolute rational unity. The a priori rational structure of reality that makes science possible is not a Platonic Ideal, but something that unfolds within history. This is what allowed Marx to conceive of dialectical materialism as a science, and this is what allows the managerial elite of the present to claim a scientific and objective basis for their programs while at the same time using the tools of historical and cultural criticism to relativize and historicize the claims of all competing moral and social "constructs."
ISSN:1744-4195
Contains:Enthalten in: Christian bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/cb/cbx003