Disenchantment revisited: Formations of the 'secular' and 'religious' in the technological discourse of modernity
This article problematizes sociologist Max Weber’s famed notion of ‘disenchantment’ in order to explore the ways in which ‘technology’ and ‘religion’ operate in the discourse of ‘secular modernity’. It suggests that disenchantment is not simply epistemological, that is, synonymous with rationalizati...
Veröffentlicht in: | Social compass |
---|---|
1. VerfasserIn: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sage
2015
|
In: |
Social compass
Jahr: 2015, Band: 62, Heft: 1, Seiten: 76-88 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920
/ Säkularisierung
/ Technisierung
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1634425871 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220616104248.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 150903s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0037768614560960 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1634425871 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)444977082 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ444977082 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1076134459 |0 (DE-627)834457628 |0 (DE-576)310420679 |4 aut |a Han, Sam |d 1984- | |
109 | |a Han, Sam 1984- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disenchantment revisited |b Formations of the 'secular' and 'religious' in the technological discourse of modernity |c Sam Han |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article problematizes sociologist Max Weber’s famed notion of ‘disenchantment’ in order to explore the ways in which ‘technology’ and ‘religion’ operate in the discourse of ‘secular modernity’. It suggests that disenchantment is not simply epistemological, that is, synonymous with rationalization and intellectualization, but also ontological, and a description of the overhauling of what Bruno Latour calls the ‘modernist settlement’. It proceeds in following manner: (1) it presents an ‘interpretive genealogy’ of technological rationality in discourses about modernity, demonstrating an internal conflict, especially in how ‘religion’, ‘the secular,’ and ‘technology’ are conceptualized. It posits that the lack of consistency in the invocation of these terms is a symptom of a deeper unresolved ontological (or, onto-cosmological) tension. (2) After establishing this ontological aporia, the article proceeds to offer a rereading of Weber’s original concept of disenchantment. (3) Finally, the author teases out some of the implications of reading disenchantment ontologically for the understanding of religion and technology. | ||
601 | |a Technologie | ||
652 | |a AD | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118629743 |0 (DE-627)060055715 |0 (DE-576)209155736 |2 gnd |a Weber, Max |d 1864-1920 |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4051238-1 |0 (DE-627)106178008 |0 (DE-576)209092149 |2 gnd |a Säkularisierung |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4454574-5 |0 (DE-627)228008298 |0 (DE-576)212606581 |2 gnd |a Technisierung |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Social compass |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1953 |g 62(2015), 1, Seite 76-88 |w (DE-627)129068519 |w (DE-600)1570-2 |w (DE-576)01440009X |x 0037-7686 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:62 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:76-88 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768614560960 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 62 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 76-88 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3289459160 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1634425871 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20150909152730 | ||
LOK | |0 008 150903||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Mechanization,Secularization,Secularization,Secularization,Order,Order,Order |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Sécularisation,Sécularisation,Sécularisation,Laïcité,Laïcité,Déchristianisation,Laïcité (motif),Laïcité,Technicisation,Mécanisation,Mécanisation |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Secularización,Secularización,Secularización,Tecnificación |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Secolarizzazione,Secolarizzazione,Secolarizzazione,Tecnologicizzazione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗化,世俗化,俗化,俗化 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗化,世俗化,俗化,俗化 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Secularização,Secularização,Secularização,Tecnicização |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Механизация,Секуляризация (мотив),Секуляризация (каноническое право),Секуляризация |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Εκκοσμίκευση (μοτίβο),Εκκοσμίκευση (Κανονικό δίκαιο),Εκκοσμίκευση,Εκμηχάνιση,Μηχανοποίηση |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Weber, Karl Emil Maximilian,1864-1920,Weber, Maximilian Carl Emil,1864-1920,Weibo,1864-1920,Fībir, Māks,1864-1920,Makesi, Weipei,1864-1920,Ma ke si Wei bo,1864-1920,Makesi-Weibo,1864-1920,Uēbā, Makkusu,1864-1920,Veber, Maks,1864-1920,Veber, M.,1864-1920,Vēbā, Makkusu,1864-1920,Wibir, Māks,1864-1920,Weibo, Makesi,1864-1920 , Saecularisatio,Ordensausschluss,Ordensaustritt,Orden,Orden,Entchristlichung,Entkirchlichung,Verweltlichung |