The rule-following considerations and the case for moral particularism: a critical examination

According to moral generalism, the possibility of moral thought and action depends on moral principles, while according to moral particularism moral thought and action do not so depend. This article assesses a common argument marshalled in favour of particularism, which draws on Wittgenstein's...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethical perspectives
Main Author: Sharp, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters [2016]
In: Ethical perspectives
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Ethics / Particularism / Principle / Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1889-1951 / Rule
RelBib Classification:NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1636131514
003 DE-627
005 20170105114800.0
007 tu
008 161229s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/EP.23.3.3170039  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1636131514 
035 |a (DE-576)481339752 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ481339752 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1034636863  |0 (DE-627)746060548  |0 (DE-576)38227296X  |4 aut  |a Sharp, Daniel 
109 |a Sharp, Daniel 
245 1 4 |a The rule-following considerations and the case for moral particularism  |b a critical examination  |c Daniel Sharp (New York University, USA) 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to moral generalism, the possibility of moral thought and action depends on moral principles, while according to moral particularism moral thought and action do not so depend. This article assesses a common argument marshalled in favour of particularism, which draws on Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations, as developed in John McDowell's Virtue and Reason. It argues, contra McDowell, that the rule-following considerations do not support particularism because Wittgenstein's remarks leave room for a moderate form of generalism. The paper begins by distinguishing between two kinds of particularism - standards particularism and guidance particularism - both found in McDowell's thought. After offering an interpretation of the rule-following considerations, it concludes that Wittgenstein's discussion supports neither view. The thought that they do is based on a tacit conflation of a philosophically problematic conception of rule-governedness and guidance, which Wittgenstein criticizes, with an ordinary conception, which Wittgenstein does not. The article defends this conclusion by developing a generalist account of guidance and standards, and showing that this view is compatible with the lessons of Wittgenstein's discussion. 
652 |a NCA:VA 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |0 (DE-627)106335987  |0 (DE-576)208912614  |2 gnd  |a Ethik 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4173442-7  |0 (DE-627)105379913  |0 (DE-576)209950277  |2 gnd  |a Partikularismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4175725-7  |0 (DE-627)104305541  |0 (DE-576)20996569X  |2 gnd  |a Prinzip 
689 0 3 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118634313  |0 (DE-627)135609127  |0 (DE-576)209165634  |2 gnd  |a Wittgenstein, Ludwig  |d 1889-1951 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4177368-8  |0 (DE-627)105349119  |0 (DE-576)209977159  |2 gnd  |a Regel 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical perspectives  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994  |g 23(2016), 3, Seite 411-443  |w (DE-627)182261980  |w (DE-600)1191627-8  |w (DE-576)040105555  |x 1370-0049  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:411-443 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.23.3.3170039  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 23  |j 2016  |e 3  |h 411-443 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3293207871 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1636131514 
LOK |0 005 20170105114638 
LOK |0 008 161229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Ethics,Ethics,Moral philosophy,Philosophical Ethics,Ethics,Particularism,Particularism,Particularism,Principle,Rule,Regulation,Norm 
STB 0 0 |a Particularisme,Particularisme,Particularisme,Principe,Règle,Éthique,Éthique,Morale,Morale,Morale 
STC 0 0 |a Particularismo,Particularismo,Particularismo,Principio,Regla,Ética,Ética,Ética moderna 
STD 0 0 |a Etica,Etica,Particolarismo,Particolarismo,Particolarismo,Principio,Regola 
STE 0 0 |a 伦理学,道德哲学,道德学,原则,准则,特殊主义,规则,规定,规矩 
STF 0 0 |a 倫理學,道德哲學,道德學,原則,準則,特殊主義,規則,規定,規矩 
STG 0 0 |a Particularismo,Particularismo,Particularismo,Princípio,Regra,Ética,Ética 
STH 0 0 |a Партикуляризм (философия),Партикуляризм (богословие),Партикуляризм,Правило,Принцип,Этика (мотив),Этика 
STI 0 0 |a Αρχή,Ηθική (μοτίβο),Ηθική,Κανόνας,Παρτικουλαρισμός (φιλοσοφία),Παρτικουλαρισμός (θεολογία),Παρτικουλαρισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie , Prinzipien,Prinzipienlehre , Wittgenstein, Ludwig Josef Johann,1889-1951,Wittgenstein, Ludwig J.,1889-1951,Wittgenstein, Ludovicus,1889-1951,Wittgenstein, Ludvig,1889-1951,Wittgenstein, L.,1889-1951,Wittgenstein,1889-1951,Wîtgenšṭain, Lûdwig,1889-1951,Witgenšṭeyn, Lûdwîg,1889-1951,Wītginšitāyn, Lūdwīg,1889-1951,Vitgenšteins, Ludvigs,1889-1951,Vitgenštajn, Ljudvig,1889-1951,Vitgenštajn, Ludvig,1889-1951,Vitgenšteinas, Liudvigas,1889-1951,Vitgenštejn, Ljudvig,1889-1951,Vitogenshutain, Rūtovihi,1889-1951,Uitogenshutain, Rūtovihi,1889-1951,Uitogenshutain,1889-1951,Bittnkenstaïn, Luntbich,1889-1951,Fitǧinštaīn, Lūdfīǧ,1889-1951,Witgjenshtjejn, Ljudwig,1889-1951,Vitgenštejn, Ljudvig,1889-1951,Bi teu gen syu ta in,1889-1951