Recent objections to perfect knowledge and classical approaches to omniscience

Patrick Grim and Einar Duenger Bohn have recently argued that there can be no perfectly knowing Being. In particular, they urge that the object of omniscience is logically absurd (Grim) or requires an impossible maximal point of all knowledge (Bohn). I argue that, given a more classical notion of om...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McCraw, Benjamin 1984- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Marquette Univ. Press [2016]
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 259-270
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Grim, Patrick / God / Knowledge
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1636536735
003 DE-627
005 20170306152041.0
007 tu
008 170213s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/philtheol20167553  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1636536735 
035 |a (DE-576)483376477 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ483376477 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1081957816  |0 (DE-627)846916975  |0 (DE-576)454983980  |4 aut  |a McCraw, Benjamin  |d 1984- 
109 |a McCraw, Benjamin 1984-  |a McCraw, Benjamin W. 1984- 
245 1 0 |a Recent objections to perfect knowledge and classical approaches to omniscience  |c Benjamin W. McCraw, University of South Carolina Upstate 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Patrick Grim and Einar Duenger Bohn have recently argued that there can be no perfectly knowing Being. In particular, they urge that the object of omniscience is logically absurd (Grim) or requires an impossible maximal point of all knowledge (Bohn). I argue that, given a more classical notion of omniscience found in Aquinas and Augustine, we can shift the focus of perfect knowledge from what that being must know to the mode of that being’s understanding. Since Grim and Bohn focus on the object rather than mode of God’s knowledge, this classical approach to omniscience undermines their objections. 
601 |a Knowledge 
652 |a AB:KAJ 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)171644409  |0 (DE-627)061869996  |0 (DE-576)132423111  |2 gnd  |a Grim, Patrick 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4021662-7  |0 (DE-627)104649747  |0 (DE-576)208939261  |2 gnd  |a Gott 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4066559-8  |0 (DE-627)106113100  |0 (DE-576)209165111  |2 gnd  |a Wissen 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophy & theology  |d Milwaukee, Wis. : Marquette Univ. Press, 1986  |g 28(2016), 1, Seite 259-270  |w (DE-627)169135810  |w (DE-600)896071-9  |w (DE-576)016231562  |x 0890-2461  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:259-270 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol20167553  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3294008414 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1636536735 
LOK |0 005 20170306152041 
LOK |0 008 170213||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a God,God,Knowledge 
STB 0 0 |a Dieu,Dieu,Savoir 
STC 0 0 |a Dios,Dios,Saber,Conocimiento,Conocimiento 
STD 0 0 |a Dio,Dio,Sapere 
STE 0 0 |a 知识,神,神,上帝,上帝 
STF 0 0 |a 知識,神,神,上帝,上帝 
STG 0 0 |a Deus,Deus,Saber,Conhecimento,Conhecimento 
STH 0 0 |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Знание 
STI 0 0 |a Γνώση,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Playing God , Kenntnis <Wissen>,Kenntnisse,Kenntnis,Kenntnisse