Rationality and religious traditions: an epistemological approach to theology of religions
Drawing on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, I argue that it is possible to evaluate the epistemic standing of religious traditions by comparing the narrative history of their epistemic progress and looking for places where there is asymmetry. Specifically, I consider the Christian and Islamic traditi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
2015
|
In: |
Journal of ecumenical studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, Pages: [473]-493 |
RelBib Classification: | BJ Islam CA Christianity NAB Fundamental theology NBK Soteriology |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1638138532 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230926091953.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 151102s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1638138532 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)449051005 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ449051005 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1078410445 |0 (DE-627)838530087 |0 (DE-576)449050920 |4 aut |a Brewer, David J. | |
109 | |a Brewer, David J. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rationality and religious traditions |b an epistemological approach to theology of religions |c David J. Brewer |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Drawing on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, I argue that it is possible to evaluate the epistemic standing of religious traditions by comparing the narrative history of their epistemic progress and looking for places where there is asymmetry. Specifically, I consider the Christian and Islamic traditions and the extent to which each has been able to resolve respective problems concerning the issue of divine action that has been raised in light of modern science. Explicit in this argument is that questions of epistemology can be distinguished from those of soteriology. Thus, denying the truth of a particular tradition does not have to result in denying its authentic spiritual connection or its soteriological standing. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
652 | |a BJ:CA:NAB:NBK | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of ecumenical studies |d Philadelphia, Pa. : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964 |g 50(2015), 3, Seite [473]-493 |w (DE-627)129623296 |w (DE-600)250103-X |w (DE-576)015132471 |x 0022-0558 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:[473]-493 |
935 | |a FRST |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3297245131 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1638138532 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20151102094413 | ||
LOK | |0 008 151102||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-35 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-35 | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-35 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |c Zk 400-50 |m p |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4190945951 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1638138532 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240912084838 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220922||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x SPQUE#Bibliothek der Franckeschen Stiftungen | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a FRST | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043741 |a CA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043539 |a BJ | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050926 |a NAB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |