Kant and theology
This article reports a change in Kant scholarship over the past thirty years. The consensus had been that Kant was an opponent of orthodox Christian theology, but it has now become an open question how this relation should be characterized. This article distinguishes five types of answer to this que...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Toronto Press
[2017]
|
| In: |
Toronto journal of theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 69-73 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NCA Ethics VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1639039589 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170828142306.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170823s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3138/tjt.2016-0015 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1639039589 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492682984 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492682984 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139719482 |0 (DE-627)612465462 |0 (DE-576)174470096 |4 aut |a Hare, John E. |d 1949- | |
| 109 | |a Hare, John E. 1949- |a Hare, J. E. 1949- |a Hare, J. 1949- |a Hare, John 1949- |a Hare, John Edmund 1949- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kant and theology |c John Hare |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article reports a change in Kant scholarship over the past thirty years. The consensus had been that Kant was an opponent of orthodox Christian theology, but it has now become an open question how this relation should be characterized. This article distinguishes five types of answer to this question, discusses three areas where theologically affirmative interpretations have been inadequate, and three areas where such interpretations have promise of contributing significantly to contemporary ethical theory. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 652 | |a AB:KAH:NCA:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Toronto journal of theology |d Toronto, Ontario : University of Toronto Press, 1985 |g 33(2017), 1, Seite 69-73 |w (DE-627)169136663 |w (DE-600)896191-8 |w (DE-576)016232429 |x 0826-9831 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:69-73 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/ 10.3138/tjt.2016-0015 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3299216236 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1639039589 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170828142306 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170823||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a gkix | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||