What an Apophaticist Can Know: Divine Ineffability and the Beatific Vision
For an apophatic theologian, the doctrines of divine ineffability and of the beatific vision seem, on first glance, to contradict each other. If God is beyond knowledge (as we are taught in the doctrine of divine ineffability) how can we come to know Him, fully and completely (as we are taught in th...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Marquette Univ. Press
[2017]
|
In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 205-219 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
God
/ Unexpressibility
/ Apophatic theology
/ Beatific vision
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | For an apophatic theologian, the doctrines of divine ineffability and of the beatific vision seem, on first glance, to contradict each other. If God is beyond knowledge (as we are taught in the doctrine of divine ineffability) how can we come to know Him, fully and completely (as we are taught in the doctrine of the beatific vision)? To resolve this problem, we argue that, if there are at least two qualitatively different kinds of knowledge, namely, propositional knowledge and knowledge of persons, then there are at least two qualitatively different kinds of ineffability, namely, propositional ineffability and what we will call personal ineffability. By postulating that God is propositionally ineffable but personally effable, we argue that the contradictory doctrines of divine ineffability and of the beatific vision can be reconciled. Thus, the apophatic theologian can know nothing God, but they can still come to God, fully and completely. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-2461 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol20178478 |