Why there should be no argument from evil: remarks on recognition, antitheodicy, and impossible forgiveness

I argue that we should emancipate the problem of evil and suffering from theodicist assumptions that lead to a chronic non-acknowledgment of the sufferers’ experiential point of view. This also entails emancipating the problem of evil and suffering from the need to consider the so-called argument fr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pihlström, Sami 1969- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2017]
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 78, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 523-536
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Jankélévitch, Vladimir 1903-1985 / Evil / Theodicy / Suffering / Forgiveness
RelBib Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Forgiveness
B Jankélévitch
B Evil
B Antitheodicy
B Theodicy
B Suffering
B Argument from evil
B Recognition
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1640200355
003 DE-627
005 20171220144045.0
007 tu
008 171218s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2017.1327368  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1640200355 
035 |a (DE-576)496508725 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ496508725 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120875233  |0 (DE-627)080940994  |0 (DE-576)175366993  |4 aut  |a Pihlström, Sami  |d 1969- 
109 |a Pihlström, Sami 1969- 
245 1 0 |a Why there should be no argument from evil  |b remarks on recognition, antitheodicy, and impossible forgiveness  |c Sami Pihlström 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I argue that we should emancipate the problem of evil and suffering from theodicist assumptions that lead to a chronic non-acknowledgment of the sufferers’ experiential point of view. This also entails emancipating the problem of evil and suffering from the need to consider the so-called argument from evil. In the argument ‘from’ evil, evil and suffering are seen as pieces of empirical evidence against theism. This presupposes understanding theism as a hypothesis to be tested in an evidentialist game of argumentation. Such a presupposition already fails to acknowledge the depth and variety of both religious and nonreligious approaches to living with evil and suffering. One way of cashing out what moral antitheodicism amounts to is to analyze theodicism as a failure of recognizing others’ suffering. Furthermore, one way of cashing out what this mis- or nonrecognition amounts to is to analyze the unforgivability of evil. Focusing on recognition and forgiveness here can be understood as an attempt to show that there is something seriously wrong with mainstream analytic philosophers’ of religion preoccupation with the argument from evil. In contrast, an ethically proper response to evil and suffering emerges from a serious consideration of recognition, forgiveness, and the unforgivable. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Antitheodicy 
650 4 |a Evil 
650 4 |a Suffering 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a Forgiveness 
650 4 |a Argument from evil 
650 4 |a Jankélévitch 
650 4 |a Recognition 
652 |a NBC:NCA:VA 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)119523051  |0 (DE-627)317557394  |0 (DE-576)161571417  |2 gnd  |a Jankélévitch, Vladimir  |d 1903-1985 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4007524-2  |0 (DE-627)104162554  |0 (DE-576)208870830  |2 gnd  |a Das Böse 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059740-4  |0 (DE-627)104589558  |0 (DE-576)209132027  |2 gnd  |a Theodizee 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4035177-4  |0 (DE-627)106249088  |0 (DE-576)209011076  |2 gnd  |a Leid 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4121874-7  |0 (DE-627)105766453  |0 (DE-576)209546875  |2 gnd  |a Verzeihung 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 78(2017), 4/5, Seite 523-536  |w (DE-627)731333977  |w (DE-600)2692944-2  |w (DE-576)381569306  |x 2169-2327  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:78  |g year:2017  |g number:4/5  |g pages:523-536 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2017.1327368  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 78  |j 2017  |e 4/5  |h 523-536 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301630995 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640200355 
LOK |0 005 20171220144045 
LOK |0 008 171218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evil,Evil,Forgiveness,Forgiveness,Pardon,Suffering,Suffering,Suffering in art,Theodicy,Theodicy 
STB 0 0 |a Le mal,Pardon,Pardon,Souffrance,Souffrance,Théodicée,Théodicée 
STC 0 0 |a El malo,Perdón,Perdón,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STD 0 0 |a Il male,Perdono,Perdono,Sofferenza,Sofferenza,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STE 0 0 |a 宽恕,宽恕,原谅,原谅,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲伤,不幸,悲伤,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 
STF 0 0 |a 寬恕,寬恕,原諒,原諒,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲傷,不幸,悲傷,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 
STG 0 0 |a O mal,Perdão,Perdão,Sofrimento,Sofrimento,Teodiceia,Teodiceia 
STH 0 0 |a Зло,Извинение (мотив),Извинение,Страдание (мотив),Страдание,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея 
STI 0 0 |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Πόνος <μοτίβο>,Πόνος,Δυστυχία,Κακό,Δοκιμασία,Δυστυχία (μοτίβο),Κακό (μοτίβο),Δοκιμασία (μοτίβο),Συγχώρεση (μοτίβο),Συγχώρεση,Το Κακό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Jankélévitch, V.,1903-1985,Yankélévitch, Vladimir,1903-1985,Iankélévich, Vladimir,1903-1985,Jankelivič, Vladimir,1903-1985 , Das Böse , Leiden , Vergebung,Vergeben,Verzeihen