Hasker, W. (2000). Are alternative pasts plausible?: A reply to Thomas Flint. Religious studies, 36(1), 103-105. doi:10.1017/S0034412599005119
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationHasker, William. "Are Alternative Pasts Plausible?: A Reply to Thomas Flint." Religious Studies 36, no. 1 (2000): 103-105, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412599005119.
MLA (8th ed.) CitationHasker, William. "Are Alternative Pasts Plausible?: A Reply to Thomas Flint." Religious Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, 2000, pp. 103-105, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412599005119.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.