APA (7th ed.) Citation

Echeverria, E. J. (2014). The essentialist versus historicist debate about the truth status of dogmatic formulations: A critique of the Cimorelli/Minch proposal. Louvain studies, 38(4), 356-369. doi:10.2143/LS.38.4.3129647

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Echeverria, Eduardo J. "The Essentialist Versus Historicist Debate About the Truth Status of Dogmatic Formulations: A Critique of the Cimorelli/Minch Proposal." Louvain Studies 38, no. 4 (2014): 356-369, https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.38.4.3129647.

MLA (8th ed.) Citation

Echeverria, Eduardo J. "The Essentialist Versus Historicist Debate About the Truth Status of Dogmatic Formulations: A Critique of the Cimorelli/Minch Proposal." Louvain Studies, vol. 38, no. 4, 2014, pp. 356-369, https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.38.4.3129647.