Pagan philosophers and 1 Thessalonians

Certain ancient philosophers (Celsus, Porphyry, Hierocles, Julian, and Macarius Magnes' critic) responded antagonistically to the New Testament. Their responses to several New Testament themes that appear in Paul's first letter to the Thessalonians and one specific text (1 Thess 4.15-17) s...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:New Testament studies
Auteur principal: Cook, John Granger 1955- (Auteur)
Type de support: Numérique/imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press 2006
Dans: New Testament studies
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1. / Hellenism / Philosophy
B Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1. 4,15-17 / Greece (Antiquity) / Philosophy
B Primitive Christianity / Inculturation
B Biblical geography / Hellenism / Roman Empire
RelBib Classification:HC Nouveau Testament
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1.
B Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1. 4,15-17
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:Certain ancient philosophers (Celsus, Porphyry, Hierocles, Julian, and Macarius Magnes' critic) responded antagonistically to the New Testament. Their responses to several New Testament themes that appear in Paul's first letter to the Thessalonians and one specific text (1 Thess 4.15-17) show how difficult it was to persuade some individuals to give up paganism. Their criticisms of the New Testament probably indicate how the antagonists would have read 1 Thessalonians. The essay is a contribution to the history of the reception of the New Testament.
ISSN:0028-6885
Contient:In: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0028688506000282