Guds omskiftelighed eller Guds bevaegelighed?
Resumé This review argues that there are two incompatible lines of argumentin Niels Grønkjær’s interesting book on Den nye Gud [The New God: After Fundamentalism and Atheism]. The first line suggests a purely temporal understanding of the Trinity: The Father gives up his power, then both Son and Fat...
| Publié dans: | Dansk teologisk tidsskrift |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Danois |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Anis
2011
|
| Dans: |
Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Année: 2011, Volume: 74, Numéro: 3, Pages: 238-243 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Grønkjær, Niels 1955-
/ Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Doctrine de la Trinité
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu NCC Éthique sociale |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Grønkjær
B Augustine B Trinity B Vattimo B Hegel B Blumenberg B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) De trinitate B Time |
| Résumé: | Resumé This review argues that there are two incompatible lines of argumentin Niels Grønkjær’s interesting book on Den nye Gud [The New God: After Fundamentalism and Atheism]. The first line suggests a purely temporal understanding of the Trinity: The Father gives up his power, then both Son and Father die on the cross, while only the Spirit persists in the human community of love. The second line of thought represents an Augustinian model of Trinity, reformulated via Hegel. It seems that only the second line can fulfill the author’s intentions. |
|---|---|
| Description: | Rezeption |
| ISSN: | 0105-3191 |
| Contient: | In: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
|