"Zwiesprache" - über die Frage nach dem Sinn: ein Philologe liest Bubers Traktat von dialogischen Leben
The act of reading is a process of trial and error. Intending to understand a text, one may try to follow some of its keywords using the vocabulary that one is well versed in (Bultmann's "Vorbegriffe"). To recognise his or her errors could be the first step leading to a new understand...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Kerygma und Dogma |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2016]
|
| In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Buber, Martin 1878-1965, Zwiesprache
/ Sinn
/ Dialog
|
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Buber, Martin (1878-1965)
B Dialog |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The act of reading is a process of trial and error. Intending to understand a text, one may try to follow some of its keywords using the vocabulary that one is well versed in (Bultmann's "Vorbegriffe"). To recognise his or her errors could be the first step leading to a new understanding. Reading in Buber's treatise the terms "sign", "language", and "meaning", a philologist may recall meanings of the words that don’t fit in this text. This paper traces a process by which a reading from a philological perspective leads to an understanding of a theological conviction. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0023-0707 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2016.62.1.68 |