Butler interprets Aquinas: how to speak thomistically about sex
This essay examines whether the Catholic magisterium's use of Aquinas to condemn homosexual acts is actually Thomistic. Rather than being aligned with the magisterium, Aquinas advances a moral epistemology better illuminated by the work of philosopher Judith Butler. Deploying Butler as a means...
Publié dans: | Journal of religious ethics |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley
[2014]
|
Dans: |
Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 2, Pages: 187-215 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274
/ Butler, Judith 1956-
/ Magistère ecclésiastique
/ Homosexualité
/ Droit naturel
/ Éthique
|
RelBib Classification: | KCD Hagiographie KDB Église catholique romaine NBE Anthropologie NCF Éthique sexuelle RB Ministère ecclésiastique |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | This essay examines whether the Catholic magisterium's use of Aquinas to condemn homosexual acts is actually Thomistic. Rather than being aligned with the magisterium, Aquinas advances a moral epistemology better illuminated by the work of philosopher Judith Butler. Deploying Butler as a means of immanent critique, I show how magisterial attempts to argue against lesbian and gay sex fail on their own terms. Reading Aquinas alongside Butler shows us why we need not choose between fidelity to Thomistic natural law and affirmation of lesbians and gays. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0384-9694 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12053 |