Butler interprets Aquinas: how to speak thomistically about sex

This essay examines whether the Catholic magisterium's use of Aquinas to condemn homosexual acts is actually Thomistic. Rather than being aligned with the magisterium, Aquinas advances a moral epistemology better illuminated by the work of philosopher Judith Butler. Deploying Butler as a means...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal of religious ethics
Auteur principal: Grimes, Katie Walker (Auteur)
Type de support: Numérique/imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley [2014]
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 2, Pages: 187-215
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274 / Butler, Judith 1956- / Magistère ecclésiastique / Homosexualité / Droit naturel / Éthique
RelBib Classification:KCD Hagiographie
KDB Église catholique romaine
NBE Anthropologie
NCF Éthique sexuelle
RB Ministère ecclésiastique
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This essay examines whether the Catholic magisterium's use of Aquinas to condemn homosexual acts is actually Thomistic. Rather than being aligned with the magisterium, Aquinas advances a moral epistemology better illuminated by the work of philosopher Judith Butler. Deploying Butler as a means of immanent critique, I show how magisterial attempts to argue against lesbian and gay sex fail on their own terms. Reading Aquinas alongside Butler shows us why we need not choose between fidelity to Thomistic natural law and affirmation of lesbians and gays.
ISSN:0384-9694
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12053