After MacIntyre: Kierkegaard, Kant, and classical virtue

In his influential book After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre identifies Kierkegaard's view of ethics with that of Kant. Both Kant and Kierkegaard, according to MacIntyre, accept the modern paradigm of moral activity for which freedom of the will is the ultimate basis. Ronald M. Green, in Kierkegaar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Humbert, David (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley [2014]
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 310-333
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855 / MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1929-, After virtue / Kantianism / Ethics
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NCA Ethics
NCB Personal ethics
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1647204887
003 DE-627
005 20170419180031.0
007 tu
008 160519s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12058  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1647204887 
035 |a (DE-576)469734663 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ469734663 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1100694994  |0 (DE-627)859499014  |0 (DE-576)420803289  |4 aut  |a Humbert, David 
109 |a Humbert, David 
245 1 0 |a After MacIntyre  |b Kierkegaard, Kant, and classical virtue  |c David Humbert 
264 1 |c [2014] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his influential book After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre identifies Kierkegaard's view of ethics with that of Kant. Both Kant and Kierkegaard, according to MacIntyre, accept the modern paradigm of moral activity for which freedom of the will is the ultimate basis. Ronald M. Green, in Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt, accepts and deepens this alignment between the two thinkers. Green argues that Kierkegaard deliberately obscured his debt to Kant by a systematic “misattribution” of his ideas to other thinkers, and to classical philosophy in particular. This essay argues that MacIntyre and Green are mistaken in identifying Kierkegaard with the Kantian tradition of moral autonomy and that they overlook his debt to the classical conception of virtue. In casting Kierkegaard in the role of the quintessential exponent of a modern conception of freedom, they have perhaps overlooked one of the greatest critics of moral autonomy who has ever lived. 
652 |a AB:NCA:NCB:VA 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118562002  |0 (DE-627)133369072  |0 (DE-576)20898786X  |2 gnd  |a Kierkegaard, Søren  |d 1813-1855 
689 0 1 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4462221-1  |0 (DE-627)230762948  |0 (DE-576)212682415  |a MacIntyre, Alasdair C.  |2 gnd  |d 1929-  |t After virtue 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4029513-8  |0 (DE-627)104616989  |0 (DE-576)208982965  |2 gnd  |a Kantianismus 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |0 (DE-627)106335987  |0 (DE-576)208912614  |2 gnd  |a Ethik 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1973  |g 42(2014), 2, Seite 310-333  |w (DE-627)129432709  |w (DE-600)193054-0  |w (DE-576)014804743  |x 0384-9694  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:310-333 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12058  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 42  |j 2014  |e 2  |h 310-333 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 332195060X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1647204887 
LOK |0 005 20160819142617 
LOK |0 008 160519||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052813  |a NCB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Ethics,Ethics,Moral philosophy,Philosophical Ethics,Ethics,Kantianism 
STB 0 0 |a Kantisme,Éthique,Éthique,Morale,Morale,Morale 
STC 0 0 |a Kantianismo,Ética,Ética,Ética moderna 
STD 0 0 |a Etica,Etica,Kantismo 
STE 0 0 |a 伦理学,道德哲学,道德学,康德主义,康德哲学 
STF 0 0 |a 倫理學,道德哲學,道德學,康德主義,康德哲學 
STG 0 0 |a Kantianismo,Ética,Ética 
STH 0 0 |a Кантианство,Этика (мотив),Этика 
STI 0 0 |a Ηθική (μοτίβο),Ηθική,Καντιανισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Kierkegaard, S.,1813-1855,Kirkegor, Seren,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Soeren,1813-1855,K'erkegor,1813-1855,Eremita, Victor,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Soren Aabye,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Soren A.,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Sören A.,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Søren A.,1813-1855,Kjerkegaard, S.,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, St́ren A.,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, St́ren,1813-1855,Notabene, Nikolaus,1813-1855,Minor, Petrus,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Søren Aabye,1813-1855,Kjerkegor, Seren,1813-1855,Vigilius,Haufniensis,1813-1855,Haufniensis, Vigilius,1813-1855,Climacus, Johannes,1813-1855,Silentio, Johannes de,1813-1855,Johannes,de Silentio,1813-1855,Silentio, Johannes de,1813-1855,Constantius, Constantin,1813-1855,Eremita, Viktor,1813-1855,Buchbinder, Hilarius,1813-1855,Bogbinder, Hilarius,1813-1855,Afham, William,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Soren,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, Sören,1813-1855,Anti-Climacus,1813-1855,Johannes,Climacus,1813-1855,Notabene, Nicolaus,1813-1855,Inter et inter,1813-1855,Vigilius,1813-1855,Nicolaus Notabene,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, S.A.,1813-1855,Anti-Climacus,Pseudonym von Søren Aabye Kierkegaard,1813-1855,Kierkegaard, S. A.,1813-1855 , MacIntyre, Alasdair C.,1929-,Der Verlust der Tugend , Frühkantianismus , Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie 

Similar Items

more