In pursuit of the postsecular
This article explores the various uses or – according to some authors, such as the sociologist James Beckford – misuses of the term ‘postsecular’. The variations in its use are indeed so broad that the question is justified whether the terminology as such has much analytical value. The prominence of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2015]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 2, Pages: 100-115 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Post-secularism
/ Secularism
/ Religion
/ Publicity
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism CD Christianity and Culture |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1647214076 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200226130904.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160523s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2015.1053403 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1647214076 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)46988083X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ46988083X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)113153937 |0 (DE-627)539816140 |0 (DE-576)289753775 |4 aut |a Molendijk, Arie L. |d 1957- | |
109 | |a Molendijk, Arie L. 1957- |a Molendijk, A. L. 1957- |a Molendijk, Arie Leendert 1957- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a In pursuit of the postsecular |c Arie L. Molendijk (Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, Groningen) |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article explores the various uses or – according to some authors, such as the sociologist James Beckford – misuses of the term ‘postsecular’. The variations in its use are indeed so broad that the question is justified whether the terminology as such has much analytical value. The prominence of the ‘postsecular’ in present-day debates in my view primarily indicates the inability among scholars, intellectuals and religious interest groups to come to grips with what – for some at least – is an unexpected presence and resurgence of religion in the public domains of presumably secular societies. The work of the cultural anthropologist Talal Asad shows that the secular does not preclude the religious. All kinds of religious arguments, organizations, and agents are very much present in modern ‘secular’ societies. From this perspective, the emergence of the ‘postsecular’ refers to very real phenomena, most importantly the intertwinement of the secular and the religious. For instance, religious actors do not accept the barriers of secular society and claim a role for religion in public and secular arenas. This insight could be one of the most important driving forces behind the popularity of the term ‘postsecular’ in recent years. | ||
652 | |a AB:CD | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1070113859 |0 (DE-627)823294757 |0 (DE-576)429774761 |2 gnd |a Postsäkularismus |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4463409-2 |0 (DE-627)231344279 |0 (DE-576)212697676 |2 gnd |a Säkularismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4043183-6 |0 (DE-627)106210874 |0 (DE-576)209054581 |2 gnd |a Öffentlichkeit |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 76(2015), 2, Seite 100-115 |w (DE-627)731333977 |w (DE-600)2692944-2 |w (DE-576)381569306 |x 2169-2327 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:100-115 |
856 | |u https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/98709063/In_pursuit_of_the_postsecular.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1053403 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3321989492 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1647214076 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20160601144728 | ||
LOK | |0 008 160523||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043857 |a CD | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Post-secularism,Publicity,Public life,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Secularism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Laïcité,Sécularisme,Sécularisme,Postsécularisme,Public,Espace public,Espace public,Religion,Religions,Religion |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Esfera pública,Postsecularismo,Religión,Religión,Religión,Secularismo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Post-secolarismo,Società post-secolare,Società post-secolare,Religione,Religione,Religione,Secolarismo,Sfera pubblica,Pubblico,Pubblico |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗主义,公共领域,宗教,宗教 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗主義,公共領域,宗教,宗教 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Esfera pública,Pós-secularismo,Religião,Religião,Secularismo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Общественность,Гласность,Постсекуляризм,Религия,Религия (мотив),Секуляризм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δημοσιότητα,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Κοσμικός χαρακτήρας,Μετακοσμικότητα |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Postsäkulare Gesellschaft , Säkularität , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Öffentliches Leben |