Disputation terminology and edetorial activity in the academy of Rava Bar Yosef Bar Hama
The role of Rava bar Yosef bar Hama of Mehoza in the editing of the Babylonian Talmud has long been a matter of rabbinic and academic dispute.1 Although Seder Tannaim V'Amoraim is unequivocal in this regard, modern scholars have raised many doubts about Rava's editorial role. New evidence...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
College
2001
|
In: |
Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Year: 2001, Volume: 72, Pages: 61-83 |
RelBib Classification: | BH Judaism |
Further subjects: | B
Talmud
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 165033849X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20191104191319.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 190311s2001 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)165033849X | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)519328604 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ519328604 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hayman, Pinhas |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disputation terminology and edetorial activity in the academy of Rava Bar Yosef Bar Hama |
264 | 1 | |c 2001 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The role of Rava bar Yosef bar Hama of Mehoza in the editing of the Babylonian Talmud has long been a matter of rabbinic and academic dispute.1 Although Seder Tannaim V'Amoraim is unequivocal in this regard, modern scholars have raised many doubts about Rava's editorial role. New evidence has connected Rava to the formulation and editing of the disputation sugyot of R.Yohanan and R.Laqish. This study expands that investigation significantly, examining over three hundred disputation sugyot formulated in the איתיביה פלוני לפלוני format. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data leads convincingly to the conclusion that this disputation terminology is the product of editorial activity in fourth and fifth-generation Mehoza, specifically stressing the transmission lines of R.Huna, Rabbah and R.Nahman bar Yaakov. The indicated explanation for this phenomenon is the network of transmission lines favored by Rava and his colleagues and students in Mehoza. The results of this research invite further analysis of other disputation terminology as a method for tracing the accumulation, formulation and editing of amoraic literature as a whole. | ||
601 | |a Terminologie | ||
630 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4133699-9 |0 (DE-627)105678171 |0 (DE-576)20964611X |a Talmud |2 gnd |
652 | |a BH | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion |t Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion |d Cincinnati, Ohio : College, 1953 |g 72(2001), Seite 61-83 |w (DE-627)129525642 |w (DE-600)213556-5 |w (DE-576)014944561 |x 0360-9049 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2001 |g pages:61-83 |
935 | |a BIIN | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
CAN | |a 1 | ||
ELC | |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3336594758 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 165033849X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191104192115 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190311||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135-1)138615 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |c FTHNT097854/72/HNP |m p |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 852 2 |b Z 4/278 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a iZSA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043520 |a BH | ||
LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a CAN |a BIB |a REL | ||
SYD | 0 | 0 | |a Kasseler Talmudfragmente |