Islam in Tajikistan: actors, discourses, conflicts
The revival of Muslim values and ideas in Central Asia is perceived primarily through the lens of security, both among local regimes and by the West. The focus on extreme forms of Islam, however, prevents a balanced assessment of the religious discourse itself and obscures the reasons for the growin...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collectivité auteur: | |
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Livre |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Berlin
Stiftung Wissenschaft u. Politik
[March 2015]
|
| Dans: |
SWP research paper (2015, RP 3 (March 2015))
Année: 2015 |
| Collection/Revue: | SWP research paper
2015, RP 3 (March 2015) |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Tadschikistan
B Rôle B État B Islam B Politique religieuse B Religion B Institution religieuse B Communauté religieuse B Signification B Pratique religieuse B Islam et politique |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | The revival of Muslim values and ideas in Central Asia is perceived primarily through the lens of security, both among local regimes and by the West. The focus on extreme forms of Islam, however, prevents a balanced assessment of the religious discourse itself and obscures the reasons for the growing attraction of Islam and its potential as a force for order in the post-Soviet states. This study explores the social and political background to the revival of Islamic discourses, networks and practices in Tajikistan since the end of the Soviet Union, identifying the central actors, and laying out the intellectual and social coordinates of the symbolic struggles they are involved in. The growing significance of Islam as a source of moral and practical guidance is associated with a differentiation and pluralisation of the landscape of actors and discourses. The interpretative monopoly of the Hanafite clergy, who cultivate a tradition of tolerance towards culture-specific ritual practice and secular lifeworlds, is now challenged by reformist and universalist doctrines that reject the pragmatic consensus of the religious establishment. The state responds by suppressing the influence of religion through increasingly pervasive surveillance, but this cannot prevent the dissemination of the unwanted teachings. Reversing the tide would demand pro-active investment in good religious education. (SWP Research Paper) |
|---|---|
| Description: | "English version of SWP-Studie 6/2015." |