Anthropology, theology, critique
This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishi...
Publié dans: | Critical research on religion |
---|---|
Autres titres: | Symposium: “Towards a Critical Anthropology of Religion” |
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Critical research on religion
|
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Ethnologie
/ Science des religions
/ Théorie critique
/ Théologie
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AD Sociologie des religions FA Théologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Anthropology B prophetic critique B Public Religion |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | This article reflects on one potential relationship the anthropological study of religion might enjoy with a critical orientation to religion. To do so, I highlight a burgeoning (but tenuous) dialog between anthropology and theology. Ultimately, I propose that a focus on religion and human flourishing provides one wavelength on which an anthropology-theology collaboration can thrive. I follow the observation that anthropologists and theologians are united by concern with shared problems. If human and social flourishing is one such problem, then what might a collaborative configuration look like? The example I consider is how ethnographic evidence of religion in public life can be mobilized to advance prophetic theological critiques of injustice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303218757323 |