Contextualizing "religion" of young Karl Marx: A preliminary analysis
Like any other social category, the meaning and conceptual boundary of "religion" is ambiguous and contentious. Historically speaking, its semantics have been transformed in highly complex ways. What is meant by "religion" reflects the specific norms and imperatives of the classi...
Publié dans: | Critical research on religion |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Critical research on religion
|
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Marx, Karl 1818-1883
/ Religion
/ Concept
/ Histoire des idées 1840-1845
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AD Sociologie des religions VA Philosophie ZB Sociologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religion
B Science B Politics B religion-secular distinction B Karl Marx B Philosophy |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | Like any other social category, the meaning and conceptual boundary of "religion" is ambiguous and contentious. Historically speaking, its semantics have been transformed in highly complex ways. What is meant by "religion" reflects the specific norms and imperatives of the classifier. This article critically reflects upon the idea of "religion" employed by Karl Marx in the early 1840s. Marx reimagined the encompassing notion of "religion," which was predominant in his time, by privatizing it in his attempt to critique the theological foundation of the Prussian state. In this process, young Marx's discourse siphons what is claimed to be "religious" out of the categories of "philosophy," "science," and "politics." In this way, Marx constructs the realm of nonreligion where he associates his own discourse with natural reason, against the reified notion of "religion" as fantastic illusions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303217690897 |