Exploring the intricacies and dissonances of religious governance: The case of Quebec and the discourse of request
This article interrogates the extent to which institutional discourses on the governance of religious minorities are useful to think about the complexity of how religion gets negotiated in the quotidian. It takes as its starting point the exploration of the discourse on religious governance in the p...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Critical research on religion |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sage
[2016]
|
| In: |
Critical research on religion
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Québec (Provinz)
/ Religionspolitik
/ Religiöse Minderheit
/ Governance
/ Diskurs
/ Islam
/ Alltag
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik AX Interreligiöse Beziehungen BJ Islam KBQ Nordamerika ZC Politik |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Negotiation
B Islam B Religious governance B Everyday B Accommodation |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article interrogates the extent to which institutional discourses on the governance of religious minorities are useful to think about the complexity of how religion gets negotiated in the quotidian. It takes as its starting point the exploration of the discourse on religious governance in the province of Quebec organized around the notion of request for accommodations. Through an analysis of public policy documents, it examines facets of this discourse of request, including the role it plays in delimiting what we imagine the religious (and Islam, in particular) to be and how we imagine it to work. Second, drawing on interviews with self-identified Muslims in Montreal, the article explores how piety gets negotiated in their everyday. These narratives are approached as fertile sites to think differently about the recognition of difference. This two-pronged perspective acts as an invitation to think more broadly about not only what institutional discourses "produce" but also what they "obscure." |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303216630066 |