"Anti-theodicy" and Antitheodicies
The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson's article "Anti-Theodicy". Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson's division into m...
| Published in: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2019]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theodicy
/ Rejection of
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
Betenson
B philosophical methodology B Toby B Antitheodicy B problem of evil B Metaphysics |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1662933371 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190619131626.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190408s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2579 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1662933371 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1662933371 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Snellman, Lauri |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a "Anti-theodicy" and Antitheodicies |c Lauri Snellman |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson's article "Anti-Theodicy". Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson's division into moral and conceptual antitheodicies and his characterization of antitheodicies as a metacritique of the problem of evil. Moral antitheodicies are problematic, as they do not address the key conceptual issues and might end up in question-begging or moralism. Dissolving the problem of evil requires a conceptual antitheodicy that exposes its presuppositions as speculative metaphysics. Religious conceptual antitheodicies help to focus on different ways of sense-making that do not fall into theodicism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Betenson | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Toby | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Antitheodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophical methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059740-4 |0 (DE-627)104589558 |0 (DE-576)209132027 |2 gnd |a Theodizee |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4207950-0 |0 (DE-627)10511622X |0 (DE-576)210183314 |2 gnd |a Ablehnung |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 11(2019), 1, Seite 201-211 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:201-211 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Betenson, Toby |t In Defence of Moralising Anti-Theodicy |d 2019 |w (DE-627)166293338X |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/SNEAAA-2.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/2579 |x Resolving-System |z KW |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2579 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 201-211 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3420943881 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1662933371 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190527183244 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190408||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Rejection of,Refusal of,Dismissal and nonsuit,Theodicy,Theodicy |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Rejet,Révocation,Révocation,Révocation (droit civil),Théodicée,Théodicée |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Rechazo,Teodicea,Teodicea |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Rifiuto,Teodicea,Teodicea |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 拒絶,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 拒絶,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Rejeição,Teodiceia,Teodiceia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Отказ,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απόρριψη,Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||