Theism and Realism: A Match Made in Heaven?
There is no interesting entailment either way between theism and various forms of realism. Taking its cue from Dummett's characterisation of realism and his discussion of it with respect to theistic belief, this paper argues both that theism does not follow from realism, and that God cannot be...
Publié dans: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
Dans: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Théisme
/ Réalisme (Philosophie)
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
philosophy of religion
B Dummett B Realism B Wittgenstein |
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | There is no interesting entailment either way between theism and various forms of realism. Taking its cue from Dummett's characterisation of realism and his discussion of it with respect to theistic belief, this paper argues both that theism does not follow from realism, and that God cannot be appealed to in order to secure bivalence for an otherwise indeterminate subject matter. In both cases, significant appeal is made to the position that God is not a language user, which in turn is motivated by an account of understanding as aptitude possession. The resulting picture sits comfortably with the apophatism common within living religious traditions and with the view that the philosophy of religion ought to reorientate itself away from metaphysics towards more practical questions. |
---|---|
Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.2042 |