Bewährung der Gleichheit. Dialektik und radikale Demokratietheorie
Hegel's criticism of Kant's philosophyof representation can be understood as a shift from representation (Vorstellung) to presentation (Darstellung). This shift affects not only theoretical but also practical philosophy. A basic idea of Hegel's Phenomenology is that freedom can only b...
| Publié dans: | Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831, Die Phänomenologie des Geistes
/ Adorno, Theodor W. 1903-1969
/ Rancière, Jacques 1940-
/ Recherche de l’identité
/ Démocratie
/ Représentation (Politique)
/ Théorie critique
/ Dialectique
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion VA Philosophie ZC Politique en général |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Hegel's criticism of Kant's philosophyof representation can be understood as a shift from representation (Vorstellung) to presentation (Darstellung). This shift affects not only theoretical but also practical philosophy. A basic idea of Hegel's Phenomenology is that freedom can only be realized if individuals present themselves as free. Hegel often calls this conflictual process of presentation "probation" or "verification" (Bewährung). In acts of practical verification, individuals do not simply assert their identity, but carry out a liberating break with given identities. This motive was very important for Adorno's philosophy of the non-identical, but was lost in the following generations of the Frankfurt School. The essay shows that it currently lives on in Jacques Rancière's theory of radical democracy. It argues that Rancière is closer to some important intuitions of early Critical Theory than Axel Honneth!s theory of recognition. To this end, it examines a discussion between Honneth and Rancière that took place in Frankfurt in 2009. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2364-2807 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14220/jrat.2018.4.2.190 |