Incongruous Conciliation: A Constructive Critique of John Barclay's Paul and the Gift

John Barclay has recently argued that for Paul God’s grace, charis, in Christ is, almost without precedent, maximally ‘incongruous’, given to unfitting recipients. In fact, however, there are at least six further contemporary non-Christian examples, mostly Jewish, of incongruous grace in conciliatio...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Downing, Francis Gerald 1935- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Critique
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2019]
Dans: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Année: 2019, Volume: 41, Numéro: 3, Pages: 384-402
Compte rendu de:Paul and the gift (Grand Rapids, Michigan : William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2017) (Downing, Francis Gerald)
Paul and the gift (Grand Rapids, Michigan : Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2015) (Downing, Francis Gerald)
Paul and the gift (Grand Rapids, Michigan : Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2015) (Downing, Francis Gerald)
Paul and the gift (Chicago : Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2015) (Downing, Francis Gerald)
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bibel. Paulinische Briefe / Judaïsme / Grèce antique (Antiquité) / Grâce / Réconciliation
RelBib Classification:BE Religion gréco-romaine
CD Christianisme et culture
HB Ancien Testament
HC Nouveau Testament
HD Judaïsme ancien
NBK Sotériologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B καταλλαγή
B Barclay
B Conciliation
B incongruous
B Compte-rendu de lecture
B New Creation
B Reconciliation
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:John Barclay has recently argued that for Paul God’s grace, charis, in Christ is, almost without precedent, maximally ‘incongruous’, given to unfitting recipients. In fact, however, there are at least six further contemporary non-Christian examples, mostly Jewish, of incongruous grace in conciliation, some using katallagē, ‘(re-)conciliation’, others not. Further, betokening change, from discord to harmony, katallagē never on its own conveys (in)congruent ‘restoration’ of anything. This, of course, affects our interpretation of Paul in Rom. 5.10-11, 11.15 and 2 Cor. 5.17-20 (where perhaps the ‘re-’ in ‘re-conciliation’ misleads).
ISSN:1745-5294
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X18821564