Morality and mortality: why the Church of England would have rejected Walzer's supreme emergency argument
Walzer insists that his supreme emergency argument morally legitimises Churchill's 1940 decision to bomb German civilians. We contend, however, that it is morally deficient. We contend, further, that if Walzer's argument had been presented to the leaders of the Church of England in 1940 as...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2018, Volume: 39, Issue: 4, Pages: 490-501 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Walzer, Michael 1935-
/ Church of England
/ Christian ethics
/ Ethics
/ Secularism
|
RelBib Classification: | KDE Anglican Church NCC Social ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B Rights B Walzer B Church of England B supreme emergency |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1663277842 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190619131213.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190416s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13617672.2018.1441350 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1663277842 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1663277842 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schawarz, Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Morality and mortality |b why the Church of England would have rejected Walzer's supreme emergency argument |c Michael Schawarz |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Walzer insists that his supreme emergency argument morally legitimises Churchill's 1940 decision to bomb German civilians. We contend, however, that it is morally deficient. We contend, further, that if Walzer's argument had been presented to the leaders of the Church of England in 1940 as justification for the bombing of German civilians, the Church leadership would have rejected it. According to Walzer, a supreme emergency forces us to waive rights we would honour under ordinary circumstances. But the Church has a different conception of rights. Because the Church is committed to universal rights - which are inviolable and cannot be overridden - it would never have agreed with Walzer. Our discussion as to those conflicting conceptions of rights illustrates what differentiates biblical ethics from secular ethics. | ||
601 | |a England | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Church of England | |
650 | 4 | |a Walzer | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Rights | |
650 | 4 | |a supreme emergency | |
652 | |a KDE:NCC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)11928927X |0 (DE-627)080095461 |0 (DE-576)163474702 |2 gnd |a Walzer, Michael |d 1935- |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d b |0 (DE-588)1000922-X |0 (DE-627)102955921 |0 (DE-576)191137111 |2 gnd |a Church of England |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4069994-8 |0 (DE-627)106101706 |0 (DE-576)209178884 |2 gnd |a Christliche Ethik |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |0 (DE-627)106335987 |0 (DE-576)208912614 |2 gnd |a Ethik |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4463409-2 |0 (DE-627)231344279 |0 (DE-576)212697676 |2 gnd |a Säkularismus |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1015713246 |0 (DE-627)70542765X |0 (DE-576)351002855 |4 aut |a Comer, Debra R. |d 1960- | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of beliefs and values |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1980 |g 39(2018), 4, Seite 490-501 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634914 |w (DE-600)2024386-8 |w (DE-576)094752656 |x 1469-9362 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g pages:490-501 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2018.1441350 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3422509283 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1663277842 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190517095915 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190416||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050144 |a KDE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Christian ethics,Christian ethics,Ethics,Ethics,Ethics,Moral philosophy,Philosophical Ethics,Ethics,Secularism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Church of England,Laïcité,Sécularisme,Sécularisme,Éthique chrétienne,Éthique,Éthique,Morale,Morale,Morale |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Secularismo,Ética cristiana,Ética,Ética,Ética moderna |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Etica cristiana,Etica,Etica,Secolarismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗主义,伦理学,道德哲学,道德学,基督教伦理 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 世俗主義,倫理學,道德哲學,道德學,基督教倫理 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Secularismo,Ética cristã,Ética,Ética |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Секуляризм,Христианская этика,Этика (мотив),Этика |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ηθική (μοτίβο),Ηθική,Κοσμικός χαρακτήρας,Χριστιανική ηθική |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anglican Church,Anglikanische Kirche,Kirche von England,Eglise anglicane,Chiesa anglicana,Ecclesia anglicana |
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Ṿaltser, Mikhael,1935-,Walzer, Michael Laban,1935-,Ṿaltser-Fas, Mikhaʾel,1935- , Anglican Church,Anglikanische Kirche,Kirche von England,Eglise anglicane,Chiesa anglicana,Ecclesia anglicana , Christliche Moral , Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie , Säkularität |
TIM | |a 100015340101_100020241231 |b 1534 - 2024 |