The modal-epistemic argument for the existence of God is flawed
In a recent article, Emanuel Rutten has presented a novel argument for the existence of God, defined as a personal being that is the first cause of reality. An interesting feature of the argument, which caused quite a stir, is that it does not fall within any of the traditional categories of argumen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 84, Issue: 3, Pages: 307-322 |
| Further subjects: | B
Modal-epistemic argument
B Personal first cause B Rutten B God |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 166342070X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200527121142.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190418s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-018-9664-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)166342070X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP166342070X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wintein, Stefan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The modal-epistemic argument for the existence of God is flawed |c Stefan Wintein |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In a recent article, Emanuel Rutten has presented a novel argument for the existence of God, defined as a personal being that is the first cause of reality. An interesting feature of the argument, which caused quite a stir, is that it does not fall within any of the traditional categories of arguments for God's existence. Rutten calls his argument a modal-epistemic one, which reflects the fact that the first premise of his argument states that all possible truths are knowable. The main purpose of this article is a simple one: to point out that Rutten's modal-epistemic argument is flawed. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Modal-epistemic argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Personal first cause | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rutten | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 84(2018), 3, Seite 307-322 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:84 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:307-322 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11153-018-9664-3.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9664-3 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 342287125X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 166342070X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190418114703 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190418||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||