A Pragmatist Approach to the Mutual Recognition between Ethico-Political and Theological Discourses on Evil and Suffering
This paper considers what may be taken to be a hitherto somewhat neglected issue in political theology: how should the division, or dichotomy, between two rather different responses to the problem of evil and suffering - that is, the theological and the secular ethico-political approaches - be under...
| Published in: | Political theology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
| In: |
Political theology
Year: 2019, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 157-175 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Evil
/ Suffering
/ Theodicy
/ Philosophy
/ Pragmatism
/ Acknowledgment
|
| RelBib Classification: | FA Theology NBC Doctrine of God NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Evil
B Pragmatism B Antitheodicy B Theodicy B Suffering B Recognition B acknowledgment |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1663600171 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20191028153843.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190425s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1543819 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1663600171 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1663600171 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)120875233 |0 (DE-627)080940994 |0 (DE-576)175366993 |4 aut |a Pihlström, Sami |d 1969- | |
| 109 | |a Pihlström, Sami 1969- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Pragmatist Approach to the Mutual Recognition between Ethico-Political and Theological Discourses on Evil and Suffering |c Sami Pihlström |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper considers what may be taken to be a hitherto somewhat neglected issue in political theology: how should the division, or dichotomy, between two rather different responses to the problem of evil and suffering - that is, the theological and the secular ethico-political approaches - be understood and (possibly) overcome? It is suggested that pragmatism can utilize the theory of recognition in bridging this gap between two apparently very different discourses on evil and suffering. It is further argued that an antitheodicist approach to the problem of evil and suffering ought to be developed across the board, both theologically and politically. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a acknowledgment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Antitheodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pragmatism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recognition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Suffering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
| 652 | |a FA:NBC:NBE:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4007524-2 |0 (DE-627)104162554 |0 (DE-576)208870830 |2 gnd |a Das Böse |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4035177-4 |0 (DE-627)106249088 |0 (DE-576)209011076 |2 gnd |a Leid |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059740-4 |0 (DE-627)104589558 |0 (DE-576)209132027 |2 gnd |a Theodizee |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |0 (DE-627)106200259 |0 (DE-576)209066873 |2 gnd |a Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4047046-5 |0 (DE-627)106195964 |0 (DE-576)209072008 |2 gnd |a Pragmatismus |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4128520-7 |0 (DE-627)104370025 |0 (DE-576)209602775 |2 gnd |a Anerkennung |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Political theology |d Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1999 |g 20(2019), 2, Seite 157-175 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341910279 |w (DE-600)2070811-7 |w (DE-576)25998390X |x 1743-1719 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:157-175 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2018.1543819 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 20 |j 2019 |e 2 |h 157-175 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3453353242 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1663600171 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191028153855 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044020 |a FA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Acknowledgment,Recognition,Evil,Evil,Philosophy,Philosophy in literature,Pragmatism,Suffering,Suffering,Suffering in art,Theodicy,Theodicy |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Le mal,Philosophie,Philosophie,Pragmatisme,Reconnaissance,Souffrance,Souffrance,Théodicée,Théodicée |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a El malo,Filosofía,Filosofía,Pragamatismo,Reconocimiento,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Teodicea,Teodicea |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia,Filosofia,Il male,Pragmatismo,Riconoscimento,Sofferenza,Sofferenza,Teodicea,Teodicea |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 哲学,实用主义,实验主义,务实主义,承认,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲伤,不幸,悲伤,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 哲學,實用主義,實驗主義,務實主義,承認,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲傷,不幸,悲傷,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia,Filosofia,O mal,Pragmatismo,Reconhecimento,Sofrimento,Sofrimento,Teodiceia,Teodiceia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Зло,Прагматизм,Признание,Страдание (мотив),Страдание,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея,Философия (мотив),Философия |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αναγνώριση,Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Πραγματισμός,Πόνος <μοτίβο>,Πόνος,Δυστυχία,Κακό,Δοκιμασία,Δυστυχία (μοτίβο),Κακό (μοτίβο),Δοκιμασία (μοτίβο),Το Κακό,Φιλοσοφία (μοτίβο),Φιλοσοφία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Das Böse , Leiden , Philosophy,Philosophieren , Pragmatizismus,Neopragmatismus |