How, When, and Why Do Religious Actors Use Public Reason? The Case of Assisted Dying in Britain
The public reason criterion is a prominent theme in contemporary political theory. Yet scholars have focused predominantly on conceptual and normative issues at the expense of empirical questions about the language used by actors engaged in political debate. This is a particular problem in the case...
| Publié dans: | Politics and religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Politics and religion
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Großbritannien
/ Laïcité
/ Euthanasie
/ Débat
/ Groupe religieux
/ Argumentation
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions CB Spiritualité chrétienne KBF Îles britanniques ZB Sociologie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | The public reason criterion is a prominent theme in contemporary political theory. Yet scholars have focused predominantly on conceptual and normative issues at the expense of empirical questions about the language used by actors engaged in political debate. This is a particular problem in the case of religious actors, whose underlying motives for taking part in such debates are frequently driven by theological concerns. This paper explores these issues by analyzing religious opposition to the legalization of assisted dying in Britain. It shows that religious actors have tended toward the use of secular rather than theological modes of argumentation, and that this is consistent with the idea of a strategic shift in response to the increasingly secularized nature of British society. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1755-0491 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Politics and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S175504831800086X |