How, When, and Why Do Religious Actors Use Public Reason? The Case of Assisted Dying in Britain

The public reason criterion is a prominent theme in contemporary political theory. Yet scholars have focused predominantly on conceptual and normative issues at the expense of empirical questions about the language used by actors engaged in political debate. This is a particular problem in the case...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics and religion
Main Author: Kettell, Steven 1973- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2019]
In: Politics and religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Great Britain / Secularism / Terminal care / Debate / Religious group / Argumantation
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
CB Christian life; spirituality
KBF British Isles
ZB Sociology
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1663606064
003 DE-627
005 20200916163455.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190425s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S175504831800086X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1663606064 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1663606064 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)173995403  |0 (DE-627)698894073  |0 (DE-576)134832051  |4 aut  |a Kettell, Steven  |d 1973- 
109 |a Kettell, Steven 1973- 
245 1 0 |a How, When, and Why Do Religious Actors Use Public Reason? The Case of Assisted Dying in Britain  |c Steven Kettell 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The public reason criterion is a prominent theme in contemporary political theory. Yet scholars have focused predominantly on conceptual and normative issues at the expense of empirical questions about the language used by actors engaged in political debate. This is a particular problem in the case of religious actors, whose underlying motives for taking part in such debates are frequently driven by theological concerns. This paper explores these issues by analyzing religious opposition to the legalization of assisted dying in Britain. It shows that religious actors have tended toward the use of secular rather than theological modes of argumentation, and that this is consistent with the idea of a strategic shift in response to the increasingly secularized nature of British society. 
652 |a AD:CB:KBF:ZB 
689 0 0 |d g  |0 (DE-588)4022153-2  |0 (DE-627)104665513  |0 (DE-576)208942076  |2 gnd  |a Großbritannien 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4463409-2  |0 (DE-627)231344279  |0 (DE-576)212697676  |2 gnd  |a Säkularismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4077877-0  |0 (DE-627)10440051X  |0 (DE-576)209206535  |2 gnd  |a Sterbehilfe 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4148952-4  |0 (DE-627)105564931  |0 (DE-576)20976869X  |2 gnd  |a Debatte 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4177711-6  |0 (DE-627)105346616  |0 (DE-576)209979607  |2 gnd  |a Religiöse Gruppe 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4002899-9  |0 (DE-627)106391631  |0 (DE-576)208849173  |2 gnd  |a Argumentation 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics and religion  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008  |g 12(2019), 2, Seite 385-408  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)560846134  |w (DE-600)2417736-2  |w (DE-576)29433923X  |x 1755-0491  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:385-408 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/how-when-and-why-do-religious-actors-use-public-reason-the-case-of-assisted-dying-in-britain/04288989847E1FD81D7E0BCEB124EE43  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504831800086X  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 385-408 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3453364686 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1663606064 
LOK |0 005 20200916163455 
LOK |0 008 190425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044888  |a KBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043016  |a AD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053755  |a ZB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043768  |a CB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Debate,Great Britain,United Kingdom,Religious group,Church group,Secularism,Terminal care,Terminal care,Dying person,Death preparation,Death preparation 
STB 0 0 |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Débat,Euthanasie,Euthanasie,Assistance au suicide,Assistance au suicide,Suicide assisté (motif),Suicide assisté,Groupe religieux,Laïcité,Sécularisme,Sécularisme 
STC 0 0 |a Argumentación,Debate,Eutanasia,Eutanasia,Grupo religioso,Secularismo 
STD 0 0 |a Argomentazione,Dibattito,Eutanasia,Eutanasia,Gruppo religioso,Secolarismo 
STE 0 0 |a 世俗主义,安乐死,安乐死,临终关怀,宗教团体,论据,辨论,争论 
STF 0 0 |a 世俗主義,安樂死,安樂死,臨終關懷,宗教團體,論據,辨論,爭論 
STG 0 0 |a Argumentação,Debate,Eutanásia,Eutanásia,Grupo religioso,Secularismo 
STH 0 0 |a Аргументация,Дебаты,Религиозная групировка,Секуляризм,Эвтаназия (мотив),Эвтаназия 
STI 0 0 |a Δημόσια συζήτηση,Επιχειρηματολογία,Ευθανασία (μοτίβο),Ευθανασία,Θρησκευτική ομάδα,Κοσμικός χαρακτήρας 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a United Kingdom,Great Britain,UK (United Kingdom),Vereinigtes Königreich , Vereinigtes Königreich von Großbritannien und Nordirland,Großbritannien und Nordirland,England,UK,Angleterre,Brīṭāniyā al-ʿUẓmā,Brīṭāniya 'l-ʿUẓmā,Vereinigtes Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland,United Kingdom,United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,Great Britain,Grande Bretagne,British Isles,United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,Royaume-Uni,Gran Bretagna,UK,U.K.,GB,England,Grande-Bretagne,Grossbritannien,British Empire,Britisches Reich , Säkularität , Aktive Sterbehilfe,Passive Sterbehilfe,Indirekte Sterbehilfe,Euthanasie,Suizidassistenz,Suizidhilfe,Suizidbeihilfe,Beihilfe zur Selbsttötung,Assistierter Suizid , Debattieren , Argumentieren 
TIM |a 100017070101_100020241231  |b 1707 - 2024