Government interference in religious institutions and terrorism
Many states have adopted policies that monitor or attempt to control religious institutions in various ways. This ranges from limiting foreign-born clerics to approving the sermons presented in these institutions. These policies are often justified as measures to limit religious strife or terrorism...
| Publié dans: | Religion, state & society |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Religion, state & society
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
RAS Round 3 dataset
/ Global Terrorism Database
/ Institution religieuse
/ État
/ Contrôle
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions ZC Politique en général |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Terrorism
B religion-state relations B Religious Freedom |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Many states have adopted policies that monitor or attempt to control religious institutions in various ways. This ranges from limiting foreign-born clerics to approving the sermons presented in these institutions. These policies are often justified as measures to limit religious strife or terrorism by minimising extremism in the country. Are they effective? Or are they counterproductive, and promote resentment and violence? Using data from the Religion and State dataset and the Global Terrorism Database, I find that intensified government interference in religious institutions can lead to an increase in terrorism in a country. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1465-3974 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion, state & society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2018.1533691 |