Two sorts of natural theology
Usually, natural theology is understood as the project of providing arguments for the existence of God. This project is endorsed by Moreland and Craig. McGrath, on the other hand, says that this project fails. In the first part of this article, I show how McGrath's dismissal of arguments for th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2018]
|
| In: |
Studia theologica
Year: 2018, Volume: 72, Issue: 2, Pages: 173-197 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NAB Fundamental theology NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1664870288 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210623114451.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190507s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0039338X.2018.1446356 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1664870288 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1664870288 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jakobsen, Martin |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Two sorts of natural theology |c Martin Jakobsen |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Usually, natural theology is understood as the project of providing arguments for the existence of God. This project is endorsed by Moreland and Craig. McGrath, on the other hand, says that this project fails. In the first part of this article, I show how McGrath's dismissal of arguments for the existence of God follows from his view of natural theology. In the second part, I argue that McGrath's natural theology contains an accurate critique of Moreland and Craig's way of doing natural theology, a critique that exposes two major problems in their treatment of the moral argument for the existence of God. In the third part, I propose a way of providing arguments for the existence of God that avoids the problems pointed out by McGrath, namely a way of arguing that seeks to show how theology may improve a certain non-theistic understanding of a natural phenomenon. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NAB:NBC:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studia theologica |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1947 |g 72(2018), 2, Seite 173-197 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320453855 |w (DE-600)2006388-X |w (DE-576)090889746 |x 1502-7791 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:173-197 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2018.1446356 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3471915478 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1664870288 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210623114451 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190507||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050926 |a NAB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||