The anecdotal nature of religious disagreements
Most literature on religious disagreements focuses on the epistemic problems related to doctrinal disputes. While, the main argument of my paper does not address such a topic, my purpose is to point at a practical exit strategy from the blind spot to which most disagreements lead. However, in order...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2019]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2019, Volume: 80, Issue: 3, Pages: 215-229 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious conviction
/ Cognition theory
/ Ambiguity
/ Subjectivity
/ Difference of opinion
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
analytic philosophy of religion
B Religious Diversity B Religious Beliefs B religious disagreements B epistemology of religious beliefs B religious ambiguity B religious epistemic peers |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1666139122 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190724152428.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190522s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2018.1441058 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1666139122 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1666139122 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1149524952 |0 (DE-627)100966462X |0 (DE-576)496754572 |4 aut |a Bertini, Daniele |d 1973- | |
| 109 | |a Bertini, Daniele 1973- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The anecdotal nature of religious disagreements |c Daniele Bertini |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Most literature on religious disagreements focuses on the epistemic problems related to doctrinal disputes. While, the main argument of my paper does not address such a topic, my purpose is to point at a practical exit strategy from the blind spot to which most disagreements lead. However, in order to argue for my views, I need to provide a substantive account of how religious beliefs work and which epistemic obligations they involve. Such account challenges most mainstream assumptions, and needs to be developed in some details. My method consists, then, in construing a theory for religious beliefs, and exploring its consequence concerning disagreements. I will focus particularly on the positive task. Indeed, if my account for religious beliefs works, consequences easily follow. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Beliefs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a analytic philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a epistemology of religious beliefs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religious ambiguity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religious disagreements | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Diversity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religious epistemic peers | |
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4751439-5 |0 (DE-627)372510116 |0 (DE-576)216042615 |2 gnd |a Religiöse Überzeugung |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |0 (DE-627)106099086 |0 (DE-576)209182261 |2 gnd |a Erkenntnistheorie |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4138525-1 |0 (DE-627)105642010 |0 (DE-576)209686782 |2 gnd |a Ambiguität |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4058323-5 |0 (DE-627)106147706 |0 (DE-576)209125764 |2 gnd |a Subjektivität |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4114558-6 |0 (DE-627)105821276 |0 (DE-576)209485612 |2 gnd |a Meinungsverschiedenheit |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 80(2019), 3, Seite 215-229 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)731333985 |w (DE-600)2692945-4 |w (DE-576)381266621 |x 2169-2335 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:215-229 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2018.1441058 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3478933986 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1666139122 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190724152428 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190522||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguity,Cognition theory,Epistemology,Theory of knowledge,Knowledge,Difference of opinion,Religious conviction,Subjectivity |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Ambigüité,Conviction religieuse,Divergence d'opinion,Subjectivité,Théorie de la connaissance,Épistémologie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ambigüedad,Convicción religiosa,Divergencias de opinión,Epistemología,Subjetividad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguità,Convinzione religiosa,Divergenza di opinione,Epistemologia,Teoria epistemiologica,Teoria epistemiologica,Soggettività |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 主观性,主体性,歧义,无棱两可,知识论,认识论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 主觀性,主體性,歧義,無稜兩可,知識論,認識論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ambiguidade,Convicção religiosa,Divergências de opinião,Epistemologia,Subjetividade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Неоднозначность,Расхождение мнений,Религиозное убеждение,Субъективность,Теория познания |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ασάφεια,Αμφισημία,Γνωσιολογία,Γνωσιοθεωρία,Επιστημολογία,Διαφορά απόψεων,Θρησκευτική πεποίθηση,Υποκειμενικότητα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie,Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnislehre,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie , Mehrdeutigkeit,Zweideutigkeit,Uneindeutigkeit , Differenzen,Meinungsdivergenz |